Literature DB >> 18299946

Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure.

Jonathan N Sembrano1, Edward Y Cheng.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: The reported results of acetabular cage reconstruction for pelvic deficiency are widely variable. Our primary question was: what is the survivorship of cage reconstruction with a primary end point of cage revision and secondary end points of radiographic loosening and any reoperation? Secondary questions were: which factors predict cage failure, and what is the functional outcome (SF-36, WOMAC, Harris hip score) of this reconstructive method? We reviewed 72 cage reconstructions in 68 patients. Minimum followup was 1.2 years (mean, 5.1 years; range, 1.2-10.7 years). Five-year cage revision-free survivorship was 87.8%. Five-year loosening-free and acetabular reoperation-free survivorships were 80.7% and 81.3%, respectively. No single preoperative factor (age, gender, severity of pelvic defect, degree of heterotopic ossification, difference in limb lengths and centers of rotation) or intraoperative factor (type of bone graft, type of cage, changes in limb length and center of rotation) predicted cage failure. Functional outcomes were 28.9 (SF-36 Physical Component), 52.4 (SF-36 Mental Component), 33.7 (WOMAC), and 44.2 (Harris). We judged these outcomes acceptable for this sometimes challenging problem. Future techniques for treating pelvic deficiency will need to be compared with these and other outcomes in the literature. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18299946      PMCID: PMC2505268          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-008-0183-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  41 in total

Review 1.  Antiprotrusio cages for acetabular revision.

Authors:  Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Prior score availability: observations using the WOMAC osteoarthritis index.

Authors:  N Bellamy; C H Goldsmith; W W Buchanan; J Campbell; E Duku
Journal:  Br J Rheumatol       Date:  1991-04

3.  Proximal placement of the acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. A long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  G M Russotti; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population.

Authors:  A L Stewart; R D Hays; J E Ware
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.983

5.  Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation.

Authors:  W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1969-06       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee.

Authors:  N Bellamy; W W Buchanan; C H Goldsmith; J Campbell; L W Stitt
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 4.666

7.  Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification.

Authors:  A F Brooker; J W Bowerman; R A Robinson; L H Riley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1973-12       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  C S Ranawat; L D Dorr; A E Inglis
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  Revision cup arthroplasty using Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage.

Authors:  A J van Koeveringe; P E Ochsner
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2002-05-23       Impact factor: 3.075

10.  Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A D'Antonio; W N Capello; L S Borden; W L Bargar; B F Bierbaum; W G Boettcher; M E Steinberg; S D Stulberg; J H Wedge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  22 in total

1.  High failure rate with the GAP II ring and impacted allograft bone in severe acetabular defects.

Authors:  Martin A Buttaro; Diego Muñoz de la Rosa; Fernando Comba; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Trabecular Metal cups for acetabular defects with 50% or less host bone contact.

Authors:  Dror Lakstein; David Backstein; Oleg Safir; Yona Kosashvili; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Cementless acetabular revision: past, present, and future. Revision total hip arthroplasty: the acetabular side using cementless implants.

Authors:  Luis Pulido; Sridhar R Rachala; Miguel E Cabanela
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-01-14       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Bone ingrowth potential of electron beam and selective laser melting produced trabecular-like implant surfaces with and without a biomimetic coating.

Authors:  J E Biemond; G Hannink; N Verdonschot; P Buma
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 5.  Clinical evaluation and surgical options in acetabular reconstruction: A literature review.

Authors:  Asim Qamar Ahmad; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-02

Review 6.  Treatment options for chronic pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  Mark D Hasenauer; Wayne G Paprosky; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-09-18

7.  The use of customized cages in revision total hip arthroplasty for Paprosky type III acetabular bone defects.

Authors:  Yuanqing Mao; Chen Xu; Jiawei Xu; Huiwu Li; Fengxiang Liu; Degang Yu; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  Results of the cementless Plasmacup in revision total hip arthroplasty: a retrospective study of 72 cases with an average follow-up of eight years.

Authors:  Stefan Lakemeier; Guenter Aurand; Nina Timmesfeld; Thomas J Heyse; Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann; Markus D Schofer
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.362

9.  Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe defects with chronic pelvic discontinuity?

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; John J Bottros; Jonah B Hulst; Vamsi K Kancherla; Mario Moric; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage: medium follow-up results.

Authors:  J Lamo-Espinosa; J Duart Clemente; P Díaz-Rada; J Pons-Villanueva; J R Valentí-Nín
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.