Literature DB >> 12378356

Revision cup arthroplasty using Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage.

A J van Koeveringe1, P E Ochsner.   

Abstract

From 1986 until 1995 we used the Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in 31 patients (33 hips) and followed the patients for 5 years. Five patients died within the 5-year follow-up. Clinical outcome listed an average Harris hip score of 71/70/66 points after 1, 2 and 5 years respectively. One patient had a revision due to late-onset haematogenous infection. We found cup migration in nine patients. Migration was self-limiting in three cases and in two there was no bony graft ingrowth. Screw breakage was seen in one case. All migrated cages showed a higher rotational centre than cages without migration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12378356      PMCID: PMC3621000          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-002-0361-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  13 in total

1.  Structural allograft and primary press-fit cup for severe acetabular deficiency. A minimum 6-year follow-up study.

Authors:  F Traina; F Giardina; M De Clerico; A Toni
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-04-05       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure.

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; Edward Y Cheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Acetabular reinforcement rings associated with allograft for severe acetabular defects.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Luc Kerboull; Jean-Pierre Courpied; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [Exchange of acetabular cups with severe bone defects using antiprotrusion cages].

Authors:  Bernd Fink; Alexandra Grossmann; Pavel Sebena
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 5.  Clinical evaluation and surgical options in acetabular reconstruction: A literature review.

Authors:  Asim Qamar Ahmad; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-02

6.  Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.

Authors:  Xavier Flecher; Benjamin Appy; Sébastien Parratte; Matthieu Ollivier; Jean-Noel Argenson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of trabecular metal systems and antiprotrusion cages in acetabular revision surgery with severe defects: a comparative study.

Authors:  Irene Isabel López-Torres; Pablo Sanz-Ruíz; Coral Sánchez-Pérez; Ricardo Andrade-Albarracín; Javier Vaquero
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage: medium follow-up results.

Authors:  J Lamo-Espinosa; J Duart Clemente; P Díaz-Rada; J Pons-Villanueva; J R Valentí-Nín
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2012-12-20

9.  Porous tantalum shells and augments for acetabular cup revisions.

Authors:  Andrej Moličnik; Marko Hanc; Gregor Rečnik; Zmago Krajnc; Mitja Rupreht; Samo K Fokter
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-11-16

10.  Early results of revision acetabular cup using antiprotrusio reconstruction rings and allografts.

Authors:  Krzysztof Kmieć; Tomasz Dorman; Grzegorzewski Andrzej; Marek Synder; Piotr Kozłowski; Marcin Sibiński
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.