Literature DB >> 22644424

High failure rate with the GAP II ring and impacted allograft bone in severe acetabular defects.

Martin A Buttaro1, Diego Muñoz de la Rosa, Fernando Comba, Francisco Piccaluga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction rings and bone allografts have been proposed to manage severe acetabular bone loss. However, a high early failure rate of the Graft Augmentation Prosthesis (GAP) II reinforcement ring (Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ, USA) has been reported in one small series. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We therefore determined (1) the survival of this device in combination with impacted morselized allograft bone in patients with severe defects and (2) the complication rate.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 24 patients (21 aseptic and three septic) with severe acetabular bone loss (10 hips with Type III defects and 14 with Type IV defects according to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons classification). We determined function and numbers of failures. The minimum followup was 24 months (mean, 34 months; range, 24-72 months).
RESULTS: At latest followup, the reconstruction had failed in nine of the 24 patients: six with aseptic loosening, three with infection. The average postoperative Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score of the patients whose reconstructions had not failed was 16.6 points; at latest followup, these patients had radiographic evidence of incorporation and consolidation of bone allografts. Seven of the nine patients whose reconstructions had failed underwent reoperation. Fatigue fracture of the ring at the plate-cup union occurred in five patients at an average of 45 months postoperatively. All patients with failed reconstructions who underwent reoperation were treated with Trabecular Metal(™) (Zimmer Inc, Warsaw, IN, USA) cups and were functioning well at latest followup.
CONCLUSIONS: We observed a high rate (37%) of early catastrophic failures of the GAP II reconstruction ring, particularly in patients with Type IV defects. Due to this high failure rate, we have abandoned its use. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22644424      PMCID: PMC3462861          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2402-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  22 in total

1.  Technical factors for success with metal ring acetabular reconstruction.

Authors:  P Udomkiat; L D Dorr; Y Y Won; D Longjohn; Z Wan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Impaction allografting and the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device: 35 hips followed for 3-7 years.

Authors:  John V Lunn; Stephen S Kearns; William Quinlan; Paraic Murray; John O Byrne
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.717

3.  Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002.

Authors:  Steven Kurtz; Fionna Mowat; Kevin Ong; Nathan Chan; Edmund Lau; Michael Halpern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Cemented fixation with bone grafts.

Authors:  T J Slooff; J W Schimmel; P Buma
Journal:  Orthop Clin North Am       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 2.472

5.  Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  Scott M Sporer; Wayne G Paprosky
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Trabecular Metal buttress augment and the Trabecular Metal cup-cage construct in revision hip arthroplasty for severe acetabular bone loss and pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  Juan José Ballester Alfaro; José Sueiro Fernández
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 2.135

7.  Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A D'Antonio; W N Capello; L S Borden; W L Bargar; B F Bierbaum; W G Boettcher; M E Steinberg; S D Stulberg; J H Wedge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Acetabular revision with metal mesh, impaction bone grafting, and a cemented cup.

Authors:  Martín A Buttaro; Fernando Comba; Rodolfo Pusso; Francisco Piccaluga
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Fatigue failure of the GAP ring.

Authors:  Gavan P Duffy; Mary I O'Connor; Mark P Brodersen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.757

10.  The 2007 ABJS Nicolas Andry Award: three decades of clinical, basic, and applied research on thromboembolic disease after THA: rationale and clinical results of a multimodal prophylaxis protocol.

Authors:  Eduardo A Salvati; Nigel E Sharrock; Geoffrey Westrich; Hollis G Potter; Alejandro González Della Valle; Thomas P Sculco
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Acetabular reinforcement rings associated with allograft for severe acetabular defects.

Authors:  Emmanuel Gibon; Luc Kerboull; Jean-Pierre Courpied; Moussa Hamadouche
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  The use of morselized allografts without impaction and cemented cage support in acetabular revision surgery: a 4- to 9-year follow-up.

Authors:  Huifeng Ding; Yuanqing Mao; Bin Yu; Zhenan Zhu; Huiwu Li; Baoqing Yu; Jianming Huang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 2.359

3.  Lyophilized allogeneic bone tissue as an antibiotic carrier.

Authors:  Débora C Coraça-Huber; Christoph G Ammann; Michael Nogler; Manfred Fille; Lars Frommelt; Klaus-Dieter Kühn; Christian Fölsch
Journal:  Cell Tissue Bank       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 1.522

4.  Outcome and EBRA migration analysis of a reconstruction cage in acetabular revision arthroplasty: a clinical and radiological study.

Authors:  Dietmar Dammerer; Philipp Blum; David Putzer; Annelies van Beeck; Michael Nogler; Martin Thaler
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 3.067

5.  Lyophilized Human Bone Allograft as an Antibiotic Carrier: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study.

Authors:  Débora C Coraça-Huber; Stephan J M Steixner; Stevo Najman; Sanja Stojanovic; Ronja Finze; Denis Rimashevskiy; Dina Saginova; Mike Barbeck; Reinhard Schnettler
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-19

Review 6.  Pelvic discontinuity: a challenge to overcome.

Authors:  George C Babis; Vasileios S Nikolaou
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-06-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.