Literature DB >> 23001499

Acetabular distraction: an alternative for severe defects with chronic pelvic discontinuity?

Scott M Sporer1, John J Bottros, Jonah B Hulst, Vamsi K Kancherla, Mario Moric, Wayne G Paprosky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Stabilization of a pelvic discontinuity with a posterior column plate with or without an associated acetabular cage sometimes results in persistent micromotion across the discontinuity with late fatigue failure and component loosening. Acetabular distraction offers an alternative technique for reconstruction in cases of severe bone loss with an associated pelvic discontinuity. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We describe the acetabular distraction technique with porous tantalum components and evaluate its survival, function, and complication rate in patients undergoing revision for chronic pelvic discontinuity.
METHODS: Between 2002 and 2006, we treated 28 patients with a chronic pelvic discontinuity with acetabular reconstruction using acetabular distraction. A porous tantalum elliptical acetabular component was used alone or with an associated modular porous tantalum augment in all patients. Three patients died and five were lost to followup before 2 years. The remaining 20 patients were followed semiannually for a minimum of 2 years (average, 4.5 years; range, 2-7 years) with clinical (Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score) and radiographic (loosening, migration, failure) evaluation.
RESULTS: One of the 20 patients required rerevision for aseptic loosening. Fifteen patients remained radiographically stable at last followup. Four patients had early migration of their acetabular component but thereafter remained clinically asymptomatic and radiographically stable. At latest followup, the average improvement in the patients not requiring rerevision using the modified Merle d'Aubigné-Postel score was 6.6 (range, 3.3-9.6). There were no postoperative dislocations; however, one patient had an infection, one a vascular injury, and one a bowel injury.
CONCLUSIONS: Acetabular distraction with porous tantalum components provides predictable pain relief and durability at 2- to 7-year followup when reconstructing severe acetabular defects with an associated pelvic discontinuity. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23001499      PMCID: PMC3462839          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2514-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  20 in total

Review 1.  Total acetabular allografts.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; T D Sekundiak
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1999

2.  Technical factors for success with metal ring acetabular reconstruction.

Authors:  P Udomkiat; L D Dorr; Y Y Won; D Longjohn; Z Wan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

3.  Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis.

Authors:  R M D'AUBIGNE; M POSTEL
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1954-06       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Complications of ilioischial reconstruction rings in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Stuart Goodman; Hillary Saastamoinen; Nadav Shasha; Allan Gross
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Acetabular defect classification: a detailed radiographic approach.

Authors:  M S Bradford; W G Paprosky
Journal:  Semin Arthroplasty       Date:  1995-04

6.  Acetabular defect classification and surgical reconstruction in revision arthroplasty. A 6-year follow-up evaluation.

Authors:  W G Paprosky; P G Perona; J M Lawrence
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Pelvic discontinuity in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D J Berry; D G Lewallen; A D Hanssen; M E Cabanela
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Revision surgery in pelvic discontinuity: an analysis of seven patients.

Authors:  Stefan Eggli; Christian Müller; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Use of custom triflanged acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ginger E Holt; Douglas A Dennis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Does a cemented cage improve revision THA for severe acetabular defects?

Authors:  Erik Hansen; David Shearer; Michael D Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  22 in total

1.  [Treatment of acetabular defects with the trabecular metal revision system].

Authors:  G I Wassilew; V Janz; C Perka; M Müller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Clinical evaluation and surgical options in acetabular reconstruction: A literature review.

Authors:  Asim Qamar Ahmad; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-02

3.  CORR Insights®: Novel Acetabular Cup for Revision THA Improves Hip Center of Rotation: A Radiographic Evaluation.

Authors:  James A Keeney
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Treatment options for chronic pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  Mark D Hasenauer; Wayne G Paprosky; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-09-18

Review 5.  Acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  George W Fryhofer; Sireesh Ramesh; Neil P Sheth
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-12-02

6.  Tantalum Components in Difficult Acetabular Revisions Have Good Survival at 5 to 10 Years: Longer Term Followup of a Previous Report.

Authors:  Paul F Lachiewicz; Jane Anne O'Dell
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Promising Mid-term Results With a Cup-cage Construct for Large Acetabular Defects and Pelvic Discontinuity.

Authors:  Tomas Amenabar; Wael A Rahman; Bandar M Hetaimish; Paul R Kuzyk; Oleg A Safir; Allan E Gross
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Does cup-cage reconstruction with oversized cups provide initial stability in THA for osteoporotic acetabular fractures?

Authors:  Lucian B Solomon; Patrick Studer; John M Abrahams; Stuart A Callary; Caroline R Moran; Roumen B Stamenkov; Donald W Howie
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Custom triflange revision acetabular components for significant bone defects and pelvic discontinuity: Early UK experience.

Authors:  Hosam E Matar; Veenesh Selvaratnam; Nikhil Shah; Henry Wynn Jones
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2020-02-04

10.  The use of a triflange salvage system for catastrophic pelvic osteolysis after failed total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew A Siegel; Michael J Patetta; Jason Y Chen; Diego M Barragan Echenique; Mark H Gonzalez
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-04-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.