Literature DB >> 23263834

The Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage: medium follow-up results.

J Lamo-Espinosa1, J Duart Clemente, P Díaz-Rada, J Pons-Villanueva, J R Valentí-Nín.   

Abstract

With the development of hip prosthesis, younger patients may need more than one revision surgery, with less bone stock available in each subsequent surgery. We retrospectively reviewed the hip revision surgeries in which a Burch-Schneider device has been used. Patients were classified according to the Paprosky score. Functional and clinical evaluation was assessed by the Merlé-Daubigné score. Radiolucencies were assessed by Gill's criteria. Sixteen patients with a mean age of 66.1 years were reviewed at a mean follow-up of 60.7 months. According to Paprosky classification, 18.7% were grade IIb, 56.3% grade IIIa and 25% grade IIIb. The mean Merlé-Daubigné score improved from 10 to 15 points. Radiologically, 12 patients had no radiolucencies, two had grade I radiolucencies and two had grade III radiolucencies. In greater than 50% of acetabular defects, the Burch-Schneider seems to be useful providing clinical and functional improvement. Immediately, non-progressive radiolucencies are not associated with implant loosening at the end of follow-up. The ischial flap should be inserted inside the ischial portion of the acetabulum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23263834     DOI: 10.1007/s12306-012-0233-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg        ISSN: 2035-5114


  42 in total

1.  Porous-coated cementless acetabular cups in revision surgery: a 6- to 11-year follow-up study.

Authors:  E Garcia-Cimbrelo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  The use of reinforcement rings to reconstruct deficient acetabula.

Authors:  J Rosson; J Schatzker
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-09

3.  The Burch-Schneider cage: 9-year survival in Paprosky type 3 acetabular defects. Clinical and radiological follow-up.

Authors:  Luke Jones; George Grammatopoulos; Gian Singer
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.135

4.  Bone incorporation of frozen femoral head allograft in revision total hip replacement.

Authors:  K Kondo; I Nagaya
Journal:  Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi       Date:  1993-05

5.  The use of bilobed porous-coated acetabular components without structural bone graft for type III acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty: a prospective study with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Francis H Shen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Revision arthroplasty using an anti-protrusio cage for massive acetabular bone deficiency.

Authors:  D J Berry; M E Müller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-09

7.  Total hip arthroplasty revision in elderly people with cement and Burch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage.

Authors:  L Gaiani; R Bertelli; Massimo Palmonari; G Vicenzi
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-04-29

8.  Salvage total hip reconstruction in patients with major acetabular bone deficiency using structural femoral head allografts.

Authors:  M Jasty; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1990-01

9.  The Bürch-Schneider anti-protrusio cage in revision total hip arthroplasty: indications, principles and long-term results.

Authors:  T J Gill; J B Sledge; M E Müller
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1998-11

10.  Revision of the acetabular component without cement after total hip arthroplasty. Three to six-year follow-up.

Authors:  D E Padgett; L Kull; A Rosenberg; D R Sumner; J O Galante
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Wound drainages in total hip arthroplasty: to use or not to use? Review of the literature on current practice.

Authors:  M Nanni; F Perna; C Calamelli; D Donati; O Ferrara; A Parlato; M D'Arienzo; C Faldini
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2013-05-25

2.  Clinical and radiological short-term complications after single-stage bilateral uncemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Lamo-Espinosa; S Troncoso; A Valentí-Azcárate; P Díaz de Rada; J R Valentí-Nín
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2014-11-27

3.  The biological acetabular reconstruction with bone allografts in hip revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  L Busanelli; F Castagnini; B Bordini; S Stea; P P Calderoni; A Toni
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2018-10-16

4.  Trabecular metal screw implanted for avascular necrosis of the femoral head may complicate subsequent arthroplasty surgery.

Authors:  N Papapietro; A Di Martino; G Niccoli; A Palumbo; G Salvatore; F Forriol; V Denaro
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2013-07-17

5.  Clinical and radiological outcomes of trabecular metal systems and antiprotrusion cages in acetabular revision surgery with severe defects: a comparative study.

Authors:  Irene Isabel López-Torres; Pablo Sanz-Ruíz; Coral Sánchez-Pérez; Ricardo Andrade-Albarracín; Javier Vaquero
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-02-26       Impact factor: 3.075

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.