OBJECTIVES: The paper presents a novel and more generalized concept for spatial encoding by non-unidirectional, non- bijective spatial encoding magnetic fields (SEMs). In combination with parallel local receiver coils these fields allow one to overcome the current limitations of neuronal nerve stimulation. Additionally the geometry of such fields can be adapted to anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As an example of such a parallel imaging technique using localized gradients (PatLoc)- system, we present a polar gradient system consisting of 2 x 8 rectangular current loops in octagonal arrangement, which generates a radial magnetic field gradient. By inverting the direction of current in alternating loops, a near sinusoidal field variation in the circumferential direction is produced. Ambiguities in spatial assignment are resolved by use of multiple receiver coils and parallel reconstruction. Simulations demonstrate the potential advantages and limitations of this approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The exact behaviour of PatLoc fields with respect to peripheral nerve stimulation needs to be tested in practice. Based on geometrical considerations SEMs of radial geometry allow for about three times faster gradient switching compared to conventional head gradient inserts and even more compared to whole body gradients. The strong nonlinear geometry of the fields needs to be considered for practical applications.
OBJECTIVES: The paper presents a novel and more generalized concept for spatial encoding by non-unidirectional, non- bijective spatial encoding magnetic fields (SEMs). In combination with parallel local receiver coils these fields allow one to overcome the current limitations of neuronal nerve stimulation. Additionally the geometry of such fields can be adapted to anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: As an example of such a parallel imaging technique using localized gradients (PatLoc)- system, we present a polar gradient system consisting of 2 x 8 rectangular current loops in octagonal arrangement, which generates a radial magnetic field gradient. By inverting the direction of current in alternating loops, a near sinusoidal field variation in the circumferential direction is produced. Ambiguities in spatial assignment are resolved by use of multiple receiver coils and parallel reconstruction. Simulations demonstrate the potential advantages and limitations of this approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The exact behaviour of PatLoc fields with respect to peripheral nerve stimulation needs to be tested in practice. Based on geometrical considerations SEMs of radial geometry allow for about three times faster gradient switching compared to conventional head gradient inserts and even more compared to whole body gradients. The strong nonlinear geometry of the fields needs to be considered for practical applications.
Authors: Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob; Robin M Heidemann; Mathias Nittka; Vladimir Jellus; Jianmin Wang; Berthold Kiefer; Axel Haase Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Martin Blaimer; Felix Breuer; Matthias Mueller; Robin M Heidemann; Mark A Griswold; Peter M Jakob Journal: Top Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2004-08
Authors: Pascal P Stang; Steven M Conolly; Juan M Santos; John M Pauly; Greig C Scott Journal: IEEE Trans Med Imaging Date: 2011-09-26 Impact factor: 10.048
Authors: Gigi Galiana; Jason P Stockmann; Leo Tam; Dana Peters; Hemant Tagare; R Todd Constable Journal: Concepts Magn Reson Part A Bridg Educ Res Date: 2012-09-26 Impact factor: 0.481
Authors: Shengzhen Tao; Joshua D Trzasko; Yunhong Shu; John Huston; Kevin M Johnson; Paul T Weavers; Erin M Gray; Matt A Bernstein Journal: Med Phys Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Feng Jia; Gerrit Schultz; Frederik Testud; Anna Masako Welz; Hans Weber; Sebastian Littin; Huijun Yu; Jürgen Hennig; Maxim Zaitsev Journal: MAGMA Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: K Setsompop; R Kimmlingen; E Eberlein; T Witzel; J Cohen-Adad; J A McNab; B Keil; M D Tisdall; P Hoecht; P Dietz; S F Cauley; V Tountcheva; V Matschl; V H Lenz; K Heberlein; A Potthast; H Thein; J Van Horn; A Toga; F Schmitt; D Lehne; B R Rosen; V Wedeen; L L Wald Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Ralf Kartäusch; Toni Driessle; Thomas Kampf; Thomas Christian Basse-Lüsebrink; Uvo Christoph Hoelscher; Peter Michael Jakob; Florian Fidler; Xavier Helluy Journal: MAGMA Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Gerrit Schultz; Daniel Gallichan; Hans Weber; Walter R T Witschey; Matthias Honal; Jürgen Hennig; Maxim Zaitsev Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-04-28 Impact factor: 4.668