OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we present a new performance measure of a matrix coil (also known as multi-coil) from the perspective of efficient, local, non-linear encoding without explicitly considering target encoding fields. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An optimization problem based on a joint optimization for the non-linear encoding fields is formulated. Based on the derived objective function, a figure of merit of a matrix coil is defined, which is a generalization of a previously known resistive figure of merit for traditional gradient coils. RESULTS: A cylindrical matrix coil design with a high number of elements is used to illustrate the proposed performance measure. The results are analyzed to reveal novel features of matrix coil designs, which allowed us to optimize coil parameters, such as number of coil elements. A comparison to a scaled, existing multi-coil is also provided to demonstrate the use of the proposed performance parameter. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of a matrix gradient coil profits from using a single performance parameter that takes the local encoding performance of the coil into account in relation to the dissipated power.
OBJECTIVE: In this paper, we present a new performance measure of a matrix coil (also known as multi-coil) from the perspective of efficient, local, non-linear encoding without explicitly considering target encoding fields. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An optimization problem based on a joint optimization for the non-linear encoding fields is formulated. Based on the derived objective function, a figure of merit of a matrix coil is defined, which is a generalization of a previously known resistive figure of merit for traditional gradient coils. RESULTS: A cylindrical matrix coil design with a high number of elements is used to illustrate the proposed performance measure. The results are analyzed to reveal novel features of matrix coil designs, which allowed us to optimize coil parameters, such as number of coil elements. A comparison to a scaled, existing multi-coil is also provided to demonstrate the use of the proposed performance parameter. CONCLUSIONS: The assessment of a matrix gradient coil profits from using a single performance parameter that takes the local encoding performance of the coil into account in relation to the dissipated power.
Authors: Walter R T Witschey; Chris A Cocosco; Daniel Gallichan; Gerrit Schultz; Hans Weber; Anna Welz; Jürgen Hennig; Maxim Zaitsev Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-11-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Gerrit Schultz; Peter Ullmann; Heinrich Lehr; Anna M Welz; Jürgen Hennig; Maxim Zaitsev Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-09-16 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Daniel Gallichan; Chris A Cocosco; Andrew Dewdney; Gerrit Schultz; Anna Welz; Jürgen Hennig; Maxim Zaitsev Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2010-11-30 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Christoph Juchem; Terence W Nixon; Scott McIntyre; Douglas L Rothman; Robin A de Graaf Journal: J Magn Reson Date: 2010-03-11 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Kelvin J Layton; Daniel Gallichan; Frederik Testud; Chris A Cocosco; Anna M Welz; Christoph Barmet; Klaas P Pruessmann; Jürgen Hennig; Maxim Zaitsev Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-10-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Christoph Juchem; Peter B Brown; Terence W Nixon; Scott McIntyre; Douglas L Rothman; Robin A de Graaf Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-03-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Sebastian Littin; Daniel Gallichan; Anna Masako Welz; Feng Jia; Andrew Dewdney; Hans Weber; Gerrit Schultz; Jürgen Hennig; Maxim Zaitsev Journal: MAGMA Date: 2015-02-17 Impact factor: 2.310
Authors: Thomas F Budinger; Mark D Bird; Lucio Frydman; Joanna R Long; Thomas H Mareci; William D Rooney; Bruce Rosen; John F Schenck; Victor D Schepkin; A Dean Sherry; Daniel K Sodickson; Charles S Springer; Keith R Thulborn; Kamil Uğurbil; Lawrence L Wald Journal: MAGMA Date: 2016-05-18 Impact factor: 2.310