Literature DB >> 17374908

Parallel magnetic resonance imaging.

David J Larkman1, Rita G Nunes.   

Abstract

Parallel imaging has been the single biggest innovation in magnetic resonance imaging in the last decade. The use of multiple receiver coils to augment the time consuming Fourier encoding has reduced acquisition times significantly. This increase in speed comes at a time when other approaches to acquisition time reduction were reaching engineering and human limits. A brief summary of spatial encoding in MRI is followed by an introduction to the problem parallel imaging is designed to solve. There are a large number of parallel reconstruction algorithms; this article reviews a cross-section, SENSE, SMASH, g-SMASH and GRAPPA, selected to demonstrate the different approaches. Theoretical (the g-factor) and practical (coil design) limits to acquisition speed are reviewed. The practical implementation of parallel imaging is also discussed, in particular coil calibration. How to recognize potential failure modes and their associated artefacts are shown. Well-established applications including angiography, cardiac imaging and applications using echo planar imaging are reviewed and we discuss what makes a good application for parallel imaging. Finally, active research areas where parallel imaging is being used to improve data quality by repairing artefacted images are also reviewed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17374908     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/52/7/R01

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  60 in total

1.  Derivative encoding for parallel magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jun Shen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Robust EPI Nyquist ghost elimination via spatial and temporal encoding.

Authors:  W Scott Hoge; Huan Tan; Robert A Kraft
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 4.668

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging: Review of imaging techniques and overview of liver imaging.

Authors:  Santhi Maniam; Janio Szklaruk
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-08-28

4.  MRI of degenerative lumbar spine disease: comparison of non-accelerated and parallel imaging.

Authors:  Ingo Nölte; Lars Gerigk; Marc A Brockmann; André Kemmling; Christoph Groden
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 5.  Advances in magnetic resonance neuroimaging.

Authors:  Michael E Moseley; Chunlei Liu; Sandra Rodriguez; Thomas Brosnan
Journal:  Neurol Clin       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.806

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging methodology.

Authors:  Ewald Moser; Andreas Stadlbauer; Christian Windischberger; Harald H Quick; Mark E Ladd
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Least squares for diffusion tensor estimation revisited: propagation of uncertainty with Rician and non-Rician signals.

Authors:  Antonio Tristán-Vega; Santiago Aja-Fernández; Carl-Fredrik Westin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Evaluating quantitative proton-density-mapping methods.

Authors:  Aviv Mezer; Ariel Rokem; Shai Berman; Trevor Hastie; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Accelerated whole-heart coronary MRA using motion-corrected sensitivity encoding with three-dimensional projection reconstruction.

Authors:  Jianing Pang; Behzad Sharif; Reza Arsanjani; Xiaoming Bi; Zhaoyang Fan; Qi Yang; Kuncheng Li; Daniel S Berman; Debiao Li
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 10.  Magnetic Resonance Sequences and Rapid Acquisition for MR-Guided Interventions.

Authors:  Adrienne E Campbell-Washburn; Anthony Z Faranesh; Robert J Lederman; Michael S Hansen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.266

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.