Literature DB >> 15556658

Physical interactions of static magnetic fields with living tissues.

John F Schenck1.   

Abstract

Clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was introduced in the early 1980s and has become a widely accepted and heavily utilized medical technology. This technique requires that the patients being studied be exposed to an intense magnetic field of a strength not previously encountered on a wide scale by humans. Nonetheless, the technique has proved to be very safe and the vast majority of the scans have been performed without any evidence of injury to the patient. In this article the history of proposed interactions of magnetic fields with human tissues is briefly reviewed and the predictions of electromagnetic theory on the nature and strength of these interactions are described. The physical basis of the relative weakness of these interactions is attributed to the very low magnetic susceptibility of human tissues and the lack of any substantial amount of ferromagnetic material normally occurring in these tissues. The presence of ferromagnetic foreign bodies within patients, or in the vicinity of the scanner, represents a very great hazard that must be scrupulously avoided. As technology and experience advance, ever stronger magnetic field strengths are being brought into service to improve the capabilities of this imaging technology and the benefits to patients. It is imperative that vigilance be maintained as these higher field strengths are introduced into clinical practice to assure that the high degree of patient safety that has been associated with MRI is maintained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15556658     DOI: 10.1016/j.pbiomolbio.2004.08.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol        ISSN: 0079-6107            Impact factor:   3.667


  46 in total

1.  Cardiac magnetic resonance: is phonocardiogram gating reliable in velocity-encoded phase contrast imaging?

Authors:  Kai Nassenstein; Stephan Orzada; Lars Haering; Andreas Czylwik; Christoph Jensen; Thomas Schlosser; Oliver Bruder; Mark E Ladd; Stefan Maderwald
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  Safety concerns related to magnetic field exposure.

Authors:  Amanda K Andriola Silva; Erica L Silva; E Sócrates T Egito; Artur S Carriço
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2006-09-21       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Subjective acceptance of 7 Tesla MRI for human imaging.

Authors:  Jens M Theysohn; Stefan Maderwald; Oliver Kraff; Christoph Moenninghoff; Mark E Ladd; Susanne C Ladd
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 4.  Risks and safety aspects related to PET/MR examinations.

Authors:  Gunnar Brix; Elke A Nekolla; Dietmar Nosske; Jürgen Griebel
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Functional connectivity MRI in infants: exploration of the functional organization of the developing brain.

Authors:  Christopher D Smyser; Abraham Z Snyder; Jeffrey J Neil
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Intervertebral disc lesions: visualisation with ultra-high field MRI at 11.7 T.

Authors:  Nikolaus Berger-Roscher; Fabio Galbusera; Volker Rasche; Hans-Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Short-term side-effects of brain MR examination at 7 T: a single-centre experience.

Authors:  M Cosottini; D Frosini; L Biagi; I Pesaresi; M Costagli; G Tiberi; M Symms; M Tosetti
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Radiofrequency-Triggered Drug Release from Nanoliposomes with Millimeter-Scale Resolution Using a Superimposed Static Gating Field.

Authors:  Jessica F Liu; Nishant Neel; Phillip Dang; Max Lamb; Jaime McKenna; Lauren Rodgers; Brian Litt; Zhiliang Cheng; Andrew Tsourkas; David Issadore
Journal:  Small       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 13.281

Review 9.  Toward 20 T magnetic resonance for human brain studies: opportunities for discovery and neuroscience rationale.

Authors:  Thomas F Budinger; Mark D Bird; Lucio Frydman; Joanna R Long; Thomas H Mareci; William D Rooney; Bruce Rosen; John F Schenck; Victor D Schepkin; A Dean Sherry; Daniel K Sodickson; Charles S Springer; Keith R Thulborn; Kamil Uğurbil; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.310

10.  Computational morphometry for detecting changes in brain structure due to development, aging, learning, disease and evolution.

Authors:  Daniel Mietchen; Christian Gaser
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 4.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.