Literature DB >> 18264858

Type III acetabular defect revision with bilobed components: five-year results.

Joseph T Moskal1, Michael E Higgins, Joseph Shen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Combined segmental and cavitary deficiencies of the acetabulum (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Type III) are a difficult problem that revision arthroplasty surgeons must tackle with increasing frequency. Porous-coated bilobed acetabular components are a reconstruction option that allows for increased host bone-prosthesis contact with restoration of the anatomic hip center without the use of a structural bone graft. Eleven consecutive Type III acetabular defects in 11 patients were revised with a porous-coated bilobed cup without a structural bone graft between January 1999 and January 2001 and prospectively followed. Average Harris hip scores improved from 36 preoperatively to 85 postoperatively. Radiographic analysis showed improvement in the average vertical displacement of the hip center. Average leg length discrepancies decreased from 34 mm preoperatively to 7 mm postoperatively. There have been no revisions performed or planned. Porous-coated bilobed acetabular components can provide good clinical and radiographic results at intermediate followup for treatment of Type III acetabular deficiencies. Bilobed components offer a viable option for reconstruction of Type III defects without the use of a structural bone graft or cement while maximizing the host bone-implant contact and restoring the native hip center. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18264858      PMCID: PMC2505228          DOI: 10.1007/s11999-007-0079-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  31 in total

1.  Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components: an average 7-year follow-up study.

Authors:  J T Dearborn; W H Harris
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Modular porous metal augments for treatment of severe acetabular bone loss during revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Alexandre Nehme; David G Lewallen; Arlen D Hanssen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips.

Authors:  Anthony S Unger; Randall J Lewis; Thomas Gruen
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Reconstruction of the deficient acetabulum with an oblong prosthesis: three- to seven-year results.

Authors:  D K DeBoer; M J Christie
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Treatment of type III acetabular deficiencies in revision total hip arthroplasty without structural bone-graft.

Authors:  C J Sutherland
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Isolated revision acetabuloplasty using a porous-coated cementless acetabular component without removal of a well-fixed femoral component. A 3- to 9-year follow-up study.

Authors:  J T Moskal; O A Danisa; C I Shaffrey
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Acetabular revision with use of a bilobed component inserted without cement in patients who have acetabular bone-stock deficiency.

Authors:  W M Chen; C A Engh; R H Hopper; J P McAuley; C A Engh
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Cemented total hip arthroplasty with impacted morcellized bone-grafts to restore acetabular bone defects in congenital hip dysplasia.

Authors:  S B Bolder; J Melenhorst; J W Gardeniers; T J Slooff; R P Veth; B W Schreurs
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Extra-large uncemented hemispherical acetabular components for revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  A L Whaley; D J Berry; W S Harmsen
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Bilobed oblong porous coated acetabular components in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  D J Berry; C J Sutherland; R T Trousdale; C W Colwell; H P Chandler; D Ayres; A A Yashar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  9 in total

1.  Revision hip arthroplasty using impacted cancellous bone and cement: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Gowthaman Arumugam; Shashi Kumar Nanjayan; Conal Quah; Philip Wraighte; Peter Howard
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-23

2.  Clinical and radiographic assessment of cementless acetabular revision with morsellised allografts.

Authors:  Chuang Sun; Yong-Yun Lian; Yu-Hua Jin; Cheng-Bin Zhao; Shi-Qi Pan; Xue-Feng Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Standardized reconstruction of acetabular bone defects using the cranial socket system].

Authors:  Maximilian Rudert; Boris Michael Holzapfel; Florian Kratzer; Reiner Gradinger
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Early outcomes of using custom-made augments in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  R M Tikhilov; A A Dzhavadov; A S Demin; S S Bilyk; A O Denisov; I I Shubnyakov
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.479

5.  Reconstruction of the rotation center of the hip after oblong cups in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Eduardo García-Rey; Ricardo Fernández-Fernández; David Durán; Rosario Madero
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2012-11-17

6.  Revisions of extensive acetabular defects with impaction grafting and a cement cup.

Authors:  Nienke van Egmond; Daniel C J De Kam; Jean W M Gardeniers; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Reconstruction of acetabulum in revision total hip arthroplasty for pelvic discontinuity: report of a difficult case requiring four revision arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yasuo Kokubo; Hisashi Oki; Naoto Takeura; Kohei Negoro; Kenichi Takeno; Tsuyoshi Miyazaki; Daisuke Sugita; Hideaki Nakajima
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2016-05-11

8.  Satisfying outcomes scores and survivorship achieved with impaction grafting for revision THA in young patients.

Authors:  Martijn A J Te Stroet; Wim H C Rijnen; Jean W M Gardeniers; Albert van Kampen; B Willem Schreurs
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Multiple Acetabular Revisions in THA - Poor Outcome Despite Maximum Effort.

Authors:  O Bischel; J B Seeger; Jb Seeger; M Krüger; M Krüge; R G Bitsch; Bg Bitsch
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2012-11-16
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.