Literature DB >> 35729351

Early outcomes of using custom-made augments in revision total hip arthroplasty.

R M Tikhilov1, A A Dzhavadov2, A S Demin1, S S Bilyk1, A O Denisov1, I I Shubnyakov1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The continuing high demand for revision total hip arthroplasty (RTHA) requires not only additional economic costs, but also the search for new, effective methods to manage the reconstruction of acetabular bone loss. This study focuses on the assessment of the clinical and radiographic outcomes after RTHA using custom-made augments (CMA) in the short-term follow-up period.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the results of using CMAs in 19 patients (20 hips). The average follow-up period was 41.3 months. All surgery was performed on defect types III and IV as per the Gross and Saleh classification.
RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference when comparing the Oxford Hip Score before RTHA of 15.0 (Std. deviation-5.9) and after RTHA of 36.3 (Std. deviation-6.3) (p = 0.01). All implants were radiologically stable. CMA has demonstrated a good ability to restore position of hip centre of rotation (HCOR). In the postoperative period, two patients (2 hips) had dislocations. Only one of two patients underwent re-revision due to dislocation.
CONCLUSION: Treatment of uncontained loss of bone stock in RTHA using CMA shows promising clinical and radiographic results at short-term follow-up period; however, dislocation rate is 10% in this study.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to SICOT aisbl.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Custom-made acetabular augments; Hip joint; Revision total hip arthroplasty; Uncontained loss of bone stock

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35729351     DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05489-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.479


  24 in total

Review 1.  The custom triflange cup: build it and they will come.

Authors:  G P Goodman; C A Engh
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Type III acetabular defect revision with bilobed components: five-year results.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Michael E Higgins; Joseph Shen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 3.  Acetabular impaction bone grafting in total hip replacement.

Authors:  M S Ibrahim; S Raja; F S Haddad
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 5.082

4.  Major acetabular defects treated with the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusion cage and impaction bone allograft in a large series: a 5- to 7- year follow-up study.

Authors:  Axel Marx; Alexander Beier; Anne Richter; Christoph H Lohmann; Andreas M Halder
Journal:  Hip Int       Date:  2016-09-20       Impact factor: 2.135

5.  [Acetabular revision surgery with the oblong revision cup : clinical and radiological results of 217 cases].

Authors:  S Fickert; S Pfeiffer; A Walter; K P Günther; W-C Witzleb
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Projections and Epidemiology of Revision Hip and Knee Arthroplasty in the United States to 2030.

Authors:  Andrew M Schwartz; Kevin X Farley; George N Guild; Thomas L Bradbury
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using an Acetabular Reinforcement Ring With a Hook: A Precise Follow-Up, at Average 11.4 Years, of a Previous Report.

Authors:  Kyung-Soon Park; Jong-Keun Seon; Keun-Bae Lee; Sung-Kyu Kim; Chee-Ken Chan; Taek-Rim Yoon
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 4.757

8.  Clinical Outcomes and Costs Within 90 Days of Primary or Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christine I Nichols; Joshua G Vose
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Comparing contemporary revision burden among hip and knee joint replacement registries.

Authors:  Brian J McGrory; Caryn D Etkin; David G Lewallen
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2016-05-27

Review 10.  Bone grafts, bone graft extenders, substitutes and enhancers for acetabular reconstruction in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Luca Pierannunzii; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2017-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.