Literature DB >> 10654456

Acetabular revision arthroplasty using so-called jumbo cementless components: an average 7-year follow-up study.

J T Dearborn1, W H Harris.   

Abstract

The optimal technique for acetabular revision surgery in the face of major bone stock deficiency remains controversial. One subset of these problem cases consists of hips that are amenable to reconstruction using a large, hemispherical cementless acetabular component, the so-called jumbo acetabular component. We report the intermediate-term experience of 24 hips in 24 patients who underwent an uncemented acetabular revision using a hemispherical acetabular component of > or = 66 mm diameter. In 16 hips, the femoral component was replaced as well. Of the 18 hips in patients alive after 5 years, 15 were assessed at a mean follow-up of 7.0 years (range, 5.0-10.3 years). The mean final Harris Hip Score was 86 points (range, 45-100 points). No acetabular component had been revised, and none were loose radiographically. In this difficult group, a bimodal distribution resulted. The complication rate was high. In those without infection, the results were excellent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10654456     DOI: 10.1016/s0883-5403(00)90999-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  28 in total

1.  Revision hip arthroplasty using impacted cancellous bone and cement: a long-term follow-up study.

Authors:  Gowthaman Arumugam; Shashi Kumar Nanjayan; Conal Quah; Philip Wraighte; Peter Howard
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-09-23

2.  Acetabular revisions using a cementless oblong cup: five to ten year results.

Authors:  R Civinini; A Capone; C Carulli; M Villano; M I Gusso
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-01-13       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure.

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; Edward Y Cheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Type III acetabular defect revision with bilobed components: five-year results.

Authors:  Joseph T Moskal; Michael E Higgins; Joseph Shen
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Clinical and radiographic assessment of cementless acetabular revision with morsellised allografts.

Authors:  Chuang Sun; Yong-Yun Lian; Yu-Hua Jin; Cheng-Bin Zhao; Shi-Qi Pan; Xue-Feng Liu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Do jumbo cups cause hip center elevation in revision THA? A computer simulation.

Authors:  Chima Nwankwo; Nick N Dong; Christopher D Heffernan; Michael D Ries
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 7.  Systematic review on outcomes of acetabular revisions with highly-porous metals.

Authors:  Samik Banerjee; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Robert Pivec; Harpal S Khanuja; Michael A Mont
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  [Comparison of different cup revision systems].

Authors:  K Trieb
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Continued good results with modular trabecular metal augments for acetabular defects in hip arthroplasty at 7 to 11 years.

Authors:  Michael R Whitehouse; Bassam A Masri; Clive P Duncan; Donald S Garbuz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Custom Acetabular Cages Offer Stable Fixation and Improved Hip Scores for Revision THA With Severe Bone Defects.

Authors:  Huiwu Li; Xinhua Qu; Yuanqing Mao; Kerong Dai; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.