Literature DB >> 11681385

Rate and timing cues associated with the cochlear amplifier: level discrimination based on monaural cross-frequency coincidence detection.

M G Heinz1, H S Colburn, L H Carney.   

Abstract

The perceptual significance of the cochlear amplifier was evaluated by predicting level-discrimination performance based on stochastic auditory-nerve (AN) activity. Performance was calculated for three models of processing: the optimal all-information processor (based on discharge times), the optimal rate-place processor (based on discharge counts), and a monaural coincidence-based processor that uses a non-optimal combination of rate and temporal information. An analytical AN model included compressive magnitude and level-dependent-phase responses associated with the cochlear amplifier, and high-, medium-, and low-spontaneous-rate (SR) fibers with characteristic frequencies (CFs) spanning the AN population. The relative contributions of nonlinear magnitude and nonlinear phase responses to level encoding were compared by using four versions of the model, which included and excluded the nonlinear gain and phase responses in all possible combinations. Nonlinear basilar-membrane (BM) phase responses are robustly encoded in near-CF AN fibers at low frequencies. Strongly compressive BM responses at high frequencies near CF interact with the high thresholds of low-SR AN fibers to produce large dynamic ranges. Coincidence performance based on a narrow range of AN CFs was robust across a wide dynamic range at both low and high frequencies, and matched human performance levels. Coincidence performance based on all CFs demonstrated the "near-miss" to Weber's law at low frequencies and the high-frequency "mid-level bump." Monaural coincidence detection is a physiologically realistic mechanism that is extremely general in that it can utilize AN information (average-rate, synchrony, and nonlinear-phase cues) from all SR groups.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11681385     DOI: 10.1121/1.1404977

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  28 in total

Review 1.  Quantifying the information in auditory-nerve responses for level discrimination.

Authors:  H Steven Colburn; Laurel H Carney; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-09

2.  Improved temporal coding of sinusoids in electric stimulation of the auditory nerve using desynchronizing pulse trains.

Authors:  Leonid M Litvak; Bertrand Delgutte; Donald K Eddington
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  The effects of ipsilateral, contralateral, and bilateral broadband noise on the mid-level hump in intensity discrimination.

Authors:  Elin Roverud; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory midbrain and nerve responses to sinusoidal variations in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Bram van de Sande; Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  A phenomenological model of peripheral and central neural responses to amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Encoding of vowel-like sounds in the auditory nerve: model predictions of discrimination performance.

Authors:  Qing Tan; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Auditory-nerve rate responses are inconsistent with common hypotheses for the neural correlates of loudness recruitment.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; John B Issa; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-10

8.  Predictions of formant-frequency discrimination in noise based on model auditory-nerve responses.

Authors:  Qing Tan; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effect of auditory-nerve response variability on estimates of tuning curves.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory nerve responses to chimaeric speech.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.