Literature DB >> 9193048

Effects of acoustic trauma on the representation of the vowel "eh" in cat auditory nerve fibers.

R L Miller1, J R Schilling, K R Franck, E D Young.   

Abstract

A population study of cat auditory-nerve fibers was used to characterize the permanent deficits induced by exposure to 110-115 dB SPL, narrow-band noise. Fibers in the region of acoustic trauma (roughly 1-6 kHz) showed a loss of sensitivity at best frequency (BF) of about 50-60 dB and an increased tuning bandwidth. A correlation between weakened two-tone suppression and loss of sensitivity was found for fibers with BFs above 1 kHz. Single-fiber responses to the vowel "eh" were recorded at intensities ranging from near threshold to a maximum of about 110 dB SPL. In normal cochleas, the temporal response patterns show a capture phenomenon, in which the first two formant frequencies dominate the responses at high sound levels among fibers with BFs near the formant frequencies. After acoustic trauma, fibers in the region of threshold shift synchronized to a broad range of the vowel's harmonics and thus did not show capture by the second formant at any sound level used. The broadband nature of this response is consistent with the broadened tuning observed in the damaged fibers, but may also reflect a weakening of compressive nonlinearities responsible for synchrony capture in the normal cochlea.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9193048     DOI: 10.1121/1.418321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  68 in total

1.  Dorsal cochlear nucleus response properties following acoustic trauma: response maps and spontaneous activity.

Authors:  Wei-Li Diana Ma; Eric D Young
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Psychophysiological analyses demonstrate the importance of neural envelope coding for speech perception in noise.

Authors:  Jayaganesh Swaminathan; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  A phenomenological model of peripheral and central neural responses to amplitude-modulated tones.

Authors:  Paul C Nelson; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Auditory-nerve rate responses are inconsistent with common hypotheses for the neural correlates of loudness recruitment.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; John B Issa; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-10

5.  Noise-induced cochlear synaptopathy in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  M D Valero; J A Burton; S N Hauser; T A Hackett; R Ramachandran; M C Liberman
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.208

6.  Neural representation of spectral and temporal information in speech.

Authors:  Eric D Young
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-03-12       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Effect of auditory-nerve response variability on estimates of tuning curves.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory nerve responses to chimaeric speech.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-14

9.  Auditory filter tuning inferred with short sinusoidal and notched-noise maskers.

Authors:  Skyler G Jennings; Elizabeth A Strickland
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Encoding intensity in ventral cochlear nucleus following acoustic trauma: implications for loudness recruitment.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Wei-Li D Ma; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.