Literature DB >> 14534289

Response growth with sound level in auditory-nerve fibers after noise-induced hearing loss.

Michael G Heinz1, Eric D Young.   

Abstract

People with sensorineural hearing loss are often constrained by a reduced acoustic dynamic range associated with loudness recruitment; however, the neural correlates of loudness and recruitment are still not well understood. The growth of auditory-nerve (AN) activity with sound level was compared in normal-hearing cats and in cats with a noise-induced hearing loss to test the hypothesis that AN-fiber rate-level functions are steeper in impaired ears. Stimuli included best-frequency and fixed-frequency tones, broadband noise, and a brief speech token. Three types of impaired responses were observed. 1) Fibers with rate-level functions that were similar across all stimuli typically had broad tuning, consistent with outer-hair-cell (OHC) damage. 2) Fibers with a wide dynamic range and shallow slope above threshold often retained sharp tuning, consistent with primarily inner-hair-cell (IHC) damage. 3) Fibers with very steep rate-level functions for all stimuli had thresholds above approximately 80 dB SPL and very broad tuning, consistent with severe IHC and OHC damage. Impaired rate-level slopes were on average shallower than normal for tones, and were steeper in only limited conditions. There was less variation in rate-level slopes across stimuli in impaired fibers, presumably attributable to the lack of suppression-induced reductions in slopes for complex stimuli relative to BF-tone slopes. Sloping saturation was observed less often in impaired fibers. These results illustrate that AN fibers do not provide a simple representation of the basilar-membrane I/O function and suggest that both OHC and IHC damage can affect AN response growth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14534289      PMCID: PMC2921373          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00776.2003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  42 in total

1.  Rate and timing cues associated with the cochlear amplifier: level discrimination based on monaural cross-frequency coincidence detection.

Authors:  M G Heinz; H S Colburn; L H Carney
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effects of high sound levels on responses to the vowel "eh" in cat auditory nerve.

Authors:  J C Wong; R L Miller; B M Calhoun; M B Sachs; E D Young
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Discriminability of vowel representations in cat auditory-nerve fibers after acoustic trauma.

Authors:  R L Miller; B M Calhoun; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Basilar-membrane nonlinearity and the growth of forward masking.

Authors:  C J Plack; A J Oxenham
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Psychoacoustic consequences of compression in the peripheral auditory system.

Authors:  B C Moore; A J Oxenham
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 8.934

6.  Frequency-shaped amplification changes the neural representation of speech with noise-induced hearing loss.

Authors:  J R Schilling; R L Miller; M B Sachs; E D Young
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Is loudness simply proportional to the auditory nerve spike count?

Authors:  E M Relkin; J R Doucet
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea.

Authors:  M A Ruggero; N C Rich; A Recio; S S Narayan; L Robles
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Basilar membrane nonlinearity and loudness.

Authors:  R S Schlauch; J J DiGiovanni; D T Ries
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Contrast enhancement improves the representation of /epsilon/-like vowels in the hearing-impaired auditory nerve.

Authors:  R L Miller; B M Calhoun; E D Young
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  38 in total

1.  Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities.

Authors:  Gayla L Poling; Amy R Horwitz; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2011-09-22

2.  Dorsal cochlear nucleus response properties following acoustic trauma: response maps and spontaneous activity.

Authors:  Wei-Li Diana Ma; Eric D Young
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: the effects of hearing loss on temporal integration reconsidered.

Authors:  Heinrich Neubauer; Peter Heil
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2004-12

4.  Auditory-nerve rate responses are inconsistent with common hypotheses for the neural correlates of loudness recruitment.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; John B Issa; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2005-06-10

5.  Effect of auditory-nerve response variability on estimates of tuning curves.

Authors:  Ananthakrishna Chintanpalli; Michael G Heinz
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Quantifying envelope and fine-structure coding in auditory nerve responses to chimaeric speech.

Authors:  Michael G Heinz; Jayaganesh Swaminathan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-14

7.  Recruitment of neurons and loudness. Commentary on "Encoding intensity in ventral cochlear nucleus following acoustic trauma: implications for loudness recruitment" by Cai et al. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-008-0142-y.

Authors:  Philip X Joris
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-01-22

8.  Is noise-induced cochlear neuropathy key to the generation of hyperacusis or tinnitus?

Authors:  Ann E Hickox; M Charles Liberman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.

Authors:  U-Cheng Leong; Douglas M Schwarz; Kenneth S Henry; Laurel H Carney
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

10.  Encoding intensity in ventral cochlear nucleus following acoustic trauma: implications for loudness recruitment.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Wei-Li D Ma; Eric D Young
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.