Literature DB >> 18234863

Reductions in workload and reporting time by use of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening with MRSASelect medium compared to mannitol-salt medium supplemented with oxacillin.

Philippe R S Lagacé-Wiens1, Michelle J Alfa, Kanchana Manickam, Godfrey K M Harding.   

Abstract

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a significant pathogen in both nosocomial and community settings, and screening for carriers is an important infection control practice in many hospitals. In this retrospective study, we demonstrate that the implementation of an MRSA screening protocol using a selective chromogenic medium (MRSASelect) reduced the workload for this screening test by 63.7% overall and by 12.6% per specimen and reduced the turnaround time for reporting by an average of 1.33 days for all MRSA screening specimens, 1.97 days for MRSA-positive specimens, and 1.3 days for MRSA-negative specimens compared to standard mannitol-salt agar supplemented with 6 mg of oxacillin/liter.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Substances：

Year:  2008        PMID： 18234863      PMCID： PMC2292897          DOI： 10.1128/JCM.01253-07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN： 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  11 in total

1.  Evaluation of three chromogenic media (MRSA-ID, MRSA-Select and CHROMagar MRSA) and ORSAB for surveillance cultures of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  I Nahimana; P Francioli; D S Blanc
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 2.  Control of endemic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus--recent advances and future challenges.

Authors:  S Harbarth
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 3.  Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: current perspectives.

Authors:  M F Q Kluytmans-Vandenbergh; J A J W Kluytmans
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 8.067

4.  Comparison of an enrichment broth-enhanced commercial PCR procedure versus bacteriological culture for separating non-colonized from suspected or colonized MRSA individuals.

Authors:  J H T Wagenvoort; M F H A van de Cruijs; C T M Meuwissen; J M H Gronenschild; E I G B De Brauwer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.267

5.  Evaluation of different methods for detecting methicillin (oxacillin) resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  David Velasco; Maria del Mar Tomas; Monica Cartelle; Alejandro Beceiro; Astrid Perez; Francisca Molina; Rita Moure; Rosa Villanueva; German Bou
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Multicenter evaluation of BBL CHROMagar MRSA medium for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from surveillance cultures of the anterior nares.

Authors:  Diane Flayhart; Janet F Hindler; David A Bruckner; Geraldine Hall; Rabin K Shrestha; Sherilynn A Vogel; Sandra S Richter; Wanita Howard; Rhonda Walther; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Comparison of four chromogenic media for culture-based screening of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Abdessalam Cherkaoui; Gesuele Renzi; Patrice François; Jacques Schrenzel
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.472

8.  Improved detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using phenyl mannitol broth containing aztreonam and ceftizoxime.

Authors:  H Wertheim; H A Verbrugh; C van Pelt; P de Man; A van Belkum; M C Vos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Controlled evaluation of the IDI-MRSA assay for detection of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diverse mucocutaneous specimens.

Authors:  Nour de San; Olivier Denis; Marie-Fabrice Gasasira; Ricardo De Mendonça; Claire Nonhoff; Marc J Struelens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Performance of CHROMagar selective medium and oxacillin resistance screening agar base for identifying Staphylococcus aureus and detecting methicillin resistance.

Authors:  Jan Kluytmans; Arjanne Van Griethuysen; Piet Willemse; Peter Van Keulen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.948
View more
  10 in total

1.  Evaluation of a new selective medium, BD BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in stool specimens.

Authors:  Nancy L Havill; John M Boyce
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of MRSASelect Agar, CHROMagar Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Medium, and Xpert MRSA PCR for detection of MRSA in Nares: diagnostic accuracy for surveillance samples with various bacterial densities.

Authors:  D M Wolk; J L Marx; L Dominguez; D Driscoll; R B Schifman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Multicenter Evaluation of the Xpert MRSA NxG Assay for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Nasal Swabs.

Authors:  Melanie L Yarbrough; David K Warren; Karen Allen; Dennis Burkholder; Robert Daum; Curtis Donskey; Dennis Knaack; Anthony LaMarca; Larissa May; Loren G Miller; David M Parenti; Lance Peterson; Thean Yen Tan; Raymond Widen; Diana R Hernandez; Donna M Wolk; C A Burnham
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-26       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Evaluation of a new selective medium, BD BBL CHROMagar MRSA II, for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in different specimens.

Authors:  C Wendt; N L Havill; K C Chapin; J M Boyce; R Dickenson; U Eigner; S Schütt; A M Fahr
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-14       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR assay to culture by use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA for detection of MRSA in nasal surveillance cultures from intensive care unit patients.

Authors:  James W Snyder; Gina K Munier; Charles L Johnson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-24       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Efficient processing of MRSA screening specimens by a modified inoculation protocol.

Authors:  Philipp Thelen; Kirsten Hornberg; Axel Hamprecht
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 7.  Chromogenic media for MRSA diagnostics.

Authors:  Zhenbo Xu; Yuchao Hou; Brian M Peters; Dingqiang Chen; Bing Li; Lin Li; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.316

8.  Modelling the costs and effects of selective and universal hospital admission screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Gijs Hubben; Martin Bootsma; Michiel Luteijn; Diarmuid Glynn; David Bishai; Marc Bonten; Maarten Postma
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-31       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Screening, isolation, and decolonisation strategies in the control of meticillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus in intensive care units: cost effectiveness evaluation.

Authors:  Julie V Robotham; Nicholas Graves; Barry D Cookson; Adrian G Barnett; Jennie A Wilson; Jonathan D Edgeworth; Rahul Batra; Brian H Cuthbertson; Ben S Cooper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2011-10-05

10.  Screening agars for MRSA: evaluation of a stepwise diagnostic approach with two different selective agars for the screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Authors:  Volker Micheel; Benedikt Hogan; Thomas Köller; Philipp Warnke; Sabine Crusius; Rebecca Hinz; Ralf Matthias Hagen; Norbert Georg Schwarz; Hagen Frickmann
Journal:  Mil Med Res       Date:  2015-07-21
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.