Literature DB >> 17287320

Controlled evaluation of the IDI-MRSA assay for detection of colonization by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diverse mucocutaneous specimens.

Nour de San1, Olivier Denis, Marie-Fabrice Gasasira, Ricardo De Mendonça, Claire Nonhoff, Marc J Struelens.   

Abstract

Rapid and reliable detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers is crucial for the effective control of MRSA transmission in healthcare facilities. The aim of this study was to verify the performance of the IDI-MRSA real-time PCR assay for direct MRSA detection in diverse mucocutaneous swabs from hospitalized patients. Swabs from nares (n = 522) and skin or other superficial sites (n = 478) were prospectively collected for MRSA screening from 466 patients admitted to an 858-bed teaching hospital. Swabs were inoculated onto selective chromogenic MRSA-ID agar, buffer extraction solution for IDI-MRSA assay, and enrichment broth. MRSA was detected by culture in 100 specimens from 47 patients. Compared to enrichment culture, the sensitivity and specificity of the PCR assay were 81.0 and 97.0%, respectively, and its positive and negative predictive values were 75.0 and 97.9%, respectively. The IDI-MRSA assay was more sensitive on swabs from nares (90.6%) than from other body sites (76.5%, P < 0.01). The PCR assay detected MRSA in 42 of 47 patients with culture positive study samples. Of 26 patients with culture-negative but PCR-positive study samples, 11 were probable true MRSA carriers based on patient history and/or positive culture on a new sample. The median turnaround time for PCR results was 19 h versus 3 days for agar culture results and 6 days for enrichment culture results. These data confirm the value of IDI-MRSA assay for rapid screening of MRSA mucocutaneous carriage among hospitalized patients. Cost-effectiveness studies are warranted to evaluate the impact of this assay on infection control procedures in healthcare settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17287320      PMCID: PMC1865822          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02208-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  22 in total

1.  Discrepant analysis: a biased and an unscientific method for estimating test sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  A Hadgu
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Rapid PCR-based identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from screening swabs.

Authors:  D Jonas; M Speck; F D Daschner; H Grundmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and enterococcus.

Authors:  Carlene A Muto; John A Jernigan; Belinda E Ostrowsky; Hervé M Richet; William R Jarvis; John M Boyce; Barry M Farr
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Spread of an MRSA clone with heteroresistance to oxacillin in the Netherlands.

Authors:  W Wannet
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2002-05

5.  Verification of the IDI-MRSA assay for detecting methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diverse specimen types in a core clinical laboratory setting.

Authors:  Steven J Drews; Barbara M Willey; Nathan Kreiswirth; Min Wang; Teresa Ianes; Jayne Mitchell; Mary Latchford; Allison J McGeer; Kevin C Katz
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Structural comparison of three types of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec integrated in the chromosome in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  T Ito; Y Katayama; K Asada; N Mori; K Tsutsumimoto; C Tiensasitorn; K Hiramatsu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Comparison of culture screening methods for detection of nasal carriage of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a prospective study comparing 32 methods.

Authors:  Nasia Safdar; Leah Narans; Barbara Gordon; Dennis G Maki
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  New real-time PCR assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from specimens containing a mixture of staphylococci.

Authors:  A Huletsky; R Giroux; V Rossbach; M Gagnon; M Vaillancourt; M Bernier; F Gagnon; K Truchon; M Bastien; F J Picard; A van Belkum; M Ouellette; P H Roy; M G Bergeron
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Direct detection of Staphylococcus aureus from adult and neonate nasal swab specimens using real-time polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  Suzanne M Paule; Anna C Pasquariello; Donna M Hacek; Adrienne G Fisher; Richard B Thomson; Karen L Kaul; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.568

10.  Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from sterile or nonsterile clinical samples by a new molecular assay.

Authors:  Patrice Francois; Didier Pittet; Manuela Bento; Béatrice Pepey; Pierre Vaudaux; Daniel Lew; Jacques Schrenzel
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.948

View more
  30 in total

1.  Evaluation of the Xpert MRSA assay for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from nares swabs of geriatric hospitalized patients and failure to detect a specific SCCmec type IV variant.

Authors:  C Laurent; P Bogaerts; D Schoevaerdts; O Denis; A Deplano; C Swine; M J Struelens; Y Glupczynski
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-05-29       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Evaluation of the BD GeneOhm assay using the rotor-gene 6000 platform for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from pooled screening swabs.

Authors:  Melvyn Howard Smith; Julian Hodgson; Ian Joseph Eltringham
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of molecular assays for rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Liesbet Van Heirstraeten; Andie Lee; José Cortinas Abrahantes; Christine Lammens; Evelyn Vanhommerig; Geert Molenberghs; Marc Aerts; Stephan Harbarth; Herman Goossens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR versus the CHROMagar MRSA assay for screening patients for the presence of MRSA strains.

Authors:  John M Boyce; Nancy L Havill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Performance of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus test before and during high-volume clinical use.

Authors:  Suzanne M Paule; Donna M Hacek; Bridget Kufner; Karine Truchon; Richard B Thomson; Karen L Kaul; Ari Robicsek; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Comparison of three chromogenic media and enrichment broth media for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from mucocutaneous screening specimens : Comparison of MRSA chromogenic media.

Authors:  C Nonhoff; O Denis; A Brenner; P Buidin; N Legros; C Thiroux; M Dramaix; M J Struelens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  MVPlex assay for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in naris and other swab specimens.

Authors:  Raymond P Podzorski; Haijing Li; Jian Han; Yi-Wei Tang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  A common variant of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IVa in isolates from Copenhagen, Denmark, is not detected by the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus assay.

Authors:  Mette Damkjaer Bartels; Kit Boye; Susanne Mie Rohde; Anders Rhod Larsen; Herbert Torfs; Peggy Bouchy; Robert Skov; Henrik Westh
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Automation of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus assay for high-throughput screening of nasal swab specimens.

Authors:  Xue-Ping Wang; Christine C Ginocchio
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in diverse clinical specimens by the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay and comparison with culture.

Authors:  Katja Lucke; Michael Hombach; Melanie Hug; Gaby E Pfyffer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.