Literature DB >> 17121622

Evaluation of three chromogenic media (MRSA-ID, MRSA-Select and CHROMagar MRSA) and ORSAB for surveillance cultures of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

I Nahimana1, P Francioli, D S Blanc.   

Abstract

Screening specimens were homogenised in saline 0.9% w/v before either direct inoculation or following enrichment in broth on three chromogenic media (MRSA-ID, CHROMagar MRSA and MRSA Select) and ORSAB medium for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). In total, 102 of 466 specimens yielded MRSA on at least one medium. After incubation for 16-18 h, the sensitivity was 51%, 59%, 47% and 65% on MRSA-ID, CHROMagar MRSA, ORSAB and MRSA Select, respectively, compared with 82%, 75%, 67% and 80%, respectively, after 42 h, and 93%, 95%, 79% and not tested, respectively, following broth enrichment. There were significantly more MRSA colonies on MRSA-Select after 16-18 h than on ORSAB or MRSA ID (p 0.001 and 0.0022, respectively), whereas there were more MRSA colonies after 42 h on MRSA-ID and MRSA-Select than on ORSAB (p 0.0004 and 0.012, respectively). The specificity of the media for identifying MRSA based on the colour of colonies after incubation for 16-18 h was 100%, 99%, 99% and 100%, respectively, compared with 98%, 97%, 98% and 98%, respectively, after 42 h, and 100%, 99%, 100% and not tested, respectively, following broth enrichment. The speed of detection (mean time to report a positive result) was 1.65, 1.72, 2.31 and 1.35 days, respectively. For each of the three media tested following enrichment, the use of an enrichment broth increased the detection rate of MRSA by 16-24%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 17121622     DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2006.01534.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  34 in total

1.  Comparison of BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR versus the CHROMagar MRSA assay for screening patients for the presence of MRSA strains.

Authors:  John M Boyce; Nancy L Havill
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-11-21       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Performance of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus test before and during high-volume clinical use.

Authors:  Suzanne M Paule; Donna M Hacek; Bridget Kufner; Karine Truchon; Richard B Thomson; Karen L Kaul; Ari Robicsek; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Current trends in rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and glycopeptide-resistant enterococcus species.

Authors:  Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Kelly Haccuria; Mindy Michiels; Margareta Ieven; Claire Poyart; Waleria Hryniewicz; Herman Goossens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison of chromogenic media to BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR for detection of MRSA in nasal swabs.

Authors:  Larry J Bischof; Linda Lapsley; Karen Fontecchio; Dollie Jacosalem; Carol Young; Rosemary Hankerd; Duane W Newton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-05-13       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of three chromogenic media and enrichment broth media for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from mucocutaneous screening specimens : Comparison of MRSA chromogenic media.

Authors:  C Nonhoff; O Denis; A Brenner; P Buidin; N Legros; C Thiroux; M Dramaix; M J Struelens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Evaluation of the Biomic V3 microbiology system for identification of selected species on BBL CHROMagar orientation agar and CHROMagar MRSA medium.

Authors:  Ellen Jo Baron; Holly D'Souza; Andrew Qi Wang; David L Gibbs
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Interpretation of MRSASelect screening agar at 24 hours of incubation.

Authors:  Julie Carson; Betty Lui; Linda Rosmus; Howard Rennick; Jeff Fuller
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Transmission rates, screening methods and costs of MRSA--a systematic literature review related to the prevalence in Germany.

Authors:  A Tübbicke; C Hübner; A Kramer; N-O Hübner; S Fleßa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Rapid detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in diverse clinical specimens by the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay and comparison with culture.

Authors:  Katja Lucke; Michael Hombach; Melanie Hug; Gaby E Pfyffer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Chromogenic media for MRSA diagnostics.

Authors:  Zhenbo Xu; Yuchao Hou; Brian M Peters; Dingqiang Chen; Bing Li; Lin Li; Mark E Shirtliff
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.316

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.