Literature DB >> 20181916

Comparison of the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) PCR assay to culture by use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA for detection of MRSA in nasal surveillance cultures from intensive care unit patients.

James W Snyder1, Gina K Munier, Charles L Johnson.   

Abstract

This study compared the BD GeneOhm methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) real-time PCR assay to culture by the use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA for the detection of MRSA in 627 nasal surveillance specimens collected from intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The PCR assay had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100%, 96.7%, 70.3%, and 100%, respectively. Nine of 19 false-positive PCR specimens grew methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) from broth enrichment culture, of which two demonstrated evidence of mecA gene dropout. Compared to culture by the use of BBL CHROMagar MRSA, the BD GeneOhm MRSA PCR assay demonstrated sensitivity and specificity above 95% for the detection of MRSA nasal colonization and provided shorter turnaround time in generating positive and negative final results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20181916      PMCID: PMC2849557          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01326-09

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  33 in total

Review 1.  SHEA guideline for preventing nosocomial transmission of multidrug-resistant strains of Staphylococcus aureus and enterococcus.

Authors:  Carlene A Muto; John A Jernigan; Belinda E Ostrowsky; Hervé M Richet; William R Jarvis; John M Boyce; Barry M Farr
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.254

2.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from nasal swab specimens by a real-time PCR assay.

Authors:  David K Warren; Robert S Liao; Liana R Merz; Michael Eveland; W Michael Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  A selective broth enrichment combined with real-time nuc-mecA-PCR in the exclusion of MRSA.

Authors:  Tanja Pasanen; Maija Korkeila; Sointu Mero; Eveliina Tarkka; Heli Piiparinen; Jaana Vuopio-Varkila; Martti Vaara; Päivi Tissari
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.205

4.  Nosocomial methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus primary bacteremia: at what costs?

Authors:  M A Abramson; D J Sexton
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  Multicenter evaluation of BBL CHROMagar MRSA medium for direct detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from surveillance cultures of the anterior nares.

Authors:  Diane Flayhart; Janet F Hindler; David A Bruckner; Geraldine Hall; Rabin K Shrestha; Sherilynn A Vogel; Sandra S Richter; Wanita Howard; Rhonda Walther; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Adverse clinical and economic outcomes attributable to methicillin resistance among patients with Staphylococcus aureus surgical site infection.

Authors:  John J Engemann; Yehuda Carmeli; Sara E Cosgrove; Vance G Fowler; Melissa Z Bronstein; Sharon L Trivette; Jane P Briggs; Daniel J Sexton; Keith S Kaye
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2003-02-07       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 7.  Prevention and control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Barry M Farr
Journal:  Curr Opin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.915

8.  Clinical and economic analysis of methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Brian J Kopp; David E Nix; Edward P Armstrong
Journal:  Ann Pharmacother       Date:  2004-07-20       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Outcome and attributable mortality in critically Ill patients with bacteremia involving methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Stijn I Blot; Koenraad H Vandewoude; Eric A Hoste; Francis A Colardyn
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2002-10-28

10.  Methicillin-resistant-Staphylococcus aureus hospitalizations, United States.

Authors:  Matthew J Kuehnert; Holly A Hill; Benjamin A Kupronis; Jerome I Tokars; Steven L Solomon; Daniel B Jernigan
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  16 in total

1.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) from nasal samples by multiplex real-time PCR based on dual priming AT-rich primers.

Authors:  M K Yadav; S K Kwon; H J Huh; S-W Chae; J-J Song
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 2.099

2.  Rapid confirmation of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonies on chromogenic agars by a new commercial PCR assay, the GenomEra MRSA/SA Diagnose.

Authors:  J J Hirvonen; M Nevalainen; P Tissari; S Salmenlinna; K Rantakokko-Jalava; S-S Kaukoranta
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 3.  Transmission rates, screening methods and costs of MRSA--a systematic literature review related to the prevalence in Germany.

Authors:  A Tübbicke; C Hübner; A Kramer; N-O Hübner; S Fleßa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Prevalence and genetic relatedness of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates detected by the Xpert MRSA nasal assay.

Authors:  Sophie S Arbefeville; Kunyan Zhang; Jennifer S Kroeger; Wanita J Howard; Daniel J Diekema; Sandra S Richter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of the BD Max methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) assay and the BD GeneOhm MRSA achromopeptidase assay with direct- and enriched-culture techniques using clinical specimens for detection of MRSA.

Authors:  Alexander H Dalpke; Marjeta Hofko; Stefan Zimmermann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Laboratory evaluation of the BD MAX MRSA assay.

Authors:  Raymond Widen; Vicki Healer; Suzane Silbert
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Automatic Digital Plate Reading for Surveillance Cultures.

Authors:  Thomas J Kirn
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-08-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 8.  Prevention and management of prosthetic joint infection in older adults.

Authors:  Emily K Shuman; Preeti N Malani
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2011-01-01       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  Genotypic and phenotypic characterization of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus isolates misidentified as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by the BD GeneOhm MRSA assay.

Authors:  Paul D Stamper; Lisa Louie; Henry Wong; Andrew E Simor; Jason E Farley; Karen C Carroll
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  A rapid and high-throughput screening approach for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus based on the combination of two different real-time PCR assays.

Authors:  Roel H T Nijhuis; Noortje M van Maarseveen; Erik J van Hannen; Anton A van Zwet; Ellen M Mascini
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.