Literature DB >> 15722394

Evaluation of different methods for detecting methicillin (oxacillin) resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

David Velasco1, Maria del Mar Tomas, Monica Cartelle, Alejandro Beceiro, Astrid Perez, Francisca Molina, Rita Moure, Rosa Villanueva, German Bou.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of oxacillin, cefazolin, cefoxitin, cefotaxime and imipenem discs; Etest for oxacillin; microdilution; agar screening plates with 2 and 6 mg/L of oxacillin; and PBP2' agglutination for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).
METHODS: A total of 102 clinical S. aureus isolates, including 51 MRSA isolates, tested by PCR for the presence or absence of the mecA gene (gold standard method), isolated from different patients and at different times, were tested with: oxacillin (1 microg), cefazolin, cefoxitin, cefotaxime and imipenem (all 30 microg) discs; Etest for oxacillin; microdilution with oxacillin; agar screening tests (ORSAB medium) with 2 mg/L or 6 mg/L of oxacillin; and PBP2' agglutination with two different kits for detection of MRSA strains.
RESULTS: The cefoxitin disc, ORSAB medium and PBP2' detection all showed 100% sensitivity. The cefoxitin, cefazolin and imipenem discs, Etest for oxacillin, microdilution and agar screening method with 6 mg/L at 24 h showed the highest specificity (100%), although variable degrees of sensitivity. The cefoxitin disc, which showed negative and positive predictive values of 100% and 98%, respectively was the best method for detecting MRSA isolates.
CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of availability of molecular biology techniques, the cefoxitin disc was the best predictor of methicillin resistance in S. aureus from among the techniques tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15722394     DOI: 10.1093/jac/dki017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother        ISSN: 0305-7453            Impact factor:   5.790


  35 in total

1.  Identification and Discrimination of Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Strains Isolated from Burn Wound Sites Using PCR and Authentication with MALDI-TOF-MS.

Authors:  E Madhava Charyulu; Arumugam Gnanamani; A B Mandal
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-14       Impact factor: 2.461

2.  Evaluation of different methods to detect oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and their clinical laboratory utility.

Authors:  G Boşgelmez-Tinaz; S Ulusoy; B Aridoğan; F Coşkun-Ari
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Superior discriminative performance of ceftizoxime disk diffusion test for detecting meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  J H T Wagenvoort; V E Ciraci; R J R Penders; J H M Gronenschild; E I G B De Brauwer; W H F Goessens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Current trends in rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and glycopeptide-resistant enterococcus species.

Authors:  Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Kelly Haccuria; Mindy Michiels; Margareta Ieven; Claire Poyart; Waleria Hryniewicz; Herman Goossens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Comparison of three chromogenic media and enrichment broth media for the detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from mucocutaneous screening specimens : Comparison of MRSA chromogenic media.

Authors:  C Nonhoff; O Denis; A Brenner; P Buidin; N Legros; C Thiroux; M Dramaix; M J Struelens
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Evaluation of the vitek 2 AST-P559 card for detection of oxacillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Eva Torres; Sonia Pérez; Rosa Villanueva; Germán Bou
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-10-22       Impact factor: 5.948

7.  Phenotypic detection of methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus by disk diffusion testing and Etest on Mueller-Hinton agar.

Authors:  R Skov; R Smyth; A R Larsen; A Bolmstrôm; A Karlsson; K Mills; N Frimodt-Moller; G Kahlmeter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  [Control of methicillin-resistant S. aureus by active surveillance. Results of a workshop held by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hygiene und Mikrobiologie].

Authors:  A Kola; I F Chaberny; F Mattner; U Reischl; R-P Vonberg; K Weist; C Wendt; W Witte; S Ziesing; S Suerbaum; P Gastmeier
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.041

9.  BD Phoenix and Vitek 2 detection of mecA-mediated resistance in Staphylococcus aureus with cefoxitin.

Authors:  Alan D Junkins; Shawn R Lockhart; Kristopher P Heilmann; Cassie L Dohrn; Diana L Von Stein; Patricia L Winokur; Gary V Doern; Sandra S Richter
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-07-22       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Reductions in workload and reporting time by use of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening with MRSASelect medium compared to mannitol-salt medium supplemented with oxacillin.

Authors:  Philippe R S Lagacé-Wiens; Michelle J Alfa; Kanchana Manickam; Godfrey K M Harding
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.