Literature DB >> 29118165

Multicenter Evaluation of the Xpert MRSA NxG Assay for Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Nasal Swabs.

Melanie L Yarbrough1, David K Warren2, Karen Allen3, Dennis Burkholder4, Robert Daum5, Curtis Donskey6, Dennis Knaack7, Anthony LaMarca8, Larissa May9, Loren G Miller10, David M Parenti11, Lance Peterson12, Thean Yen Tan13, Raymond Widen14, Diana R Hernandez15, Donna M Wolk15, C A Burnham16.   

Abstract

Health care-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections are a burden on the health care system. Clinical laboratories play a key role in reducing this burden, as the timely identification of MRSA colonization or infection facilitates infection control practices that are effective at limiting invasive MRSA infections. The Xpert MRSA NxG assay recently received FDA clearance for the direct detection of MRSA from nasal swabs. This multicenter study evaluated the clinical performance characteristics of the Xpert MRSA NxG assay with prospectively collected rayon nasal swabs (n = 1,103) and flocked swab (ESwab) nasal specimens (n = 846). Culture-based identification methods and antimicrobial susceptibility testing were used as the reference standards for comparison. According to the reference method, the positivity rates for MRSA in the population evaluated were 11.1% (122/1,103) for rayon swabs and 11.6% (98/846) for flocked swabs. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the rayon swabs were 91.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.6 to 94.9%) and 96.9% (95% CI, 95.7 to 97.8%), respectively, across eight testing sites. The flocked swab specimens were 92.9% sensitive (95% CI, 86.0 to 96.5%) and 97.6% specific (95% CI, 96.2 to 98.5%) for MRSA detection across six testing sites. The sensitivity and specificity of the combined flocked and rayon swab data were 91.8% (95% CI, 87.4 to 94.8%) and 97.2% (95% CI, 96.3 to 97.9%), respectively. The positive predictive value (PPV) for rayon swabs was 78.7%, versus 83.5% for ESwabs. The negative predictive values (NPVs) for rayon swabs and ESwab specimens were 98.9% and 99.1%, respectively. In conclusion, the Xpert MRSA NxG assay is a sensitive and specific assay for the direct detection of MRSA from nasal swab specimens.
Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacterial colonization; methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus; nasal swab

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29118165      PMCID: PMC5744196          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01381-17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  31 in total

1.  Comparison of MRSASelect Agar, CHROMagar Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Medium, and Xpert MRSA PCR for detection of MRSA in Nares: diagnostic accuracy for surveillance samples with various bacterial densities.

Authors:  D M Wolk; J L Marx; L Dominguez; D Driscoll; R B Schifman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Evaluation of multiple real-time PCR tests on nasal samples in a large MRSA surveillance program.

Authors:  Parul A Patel; Ari Robicsek; Althea Grayes; Donna M Schora; Kari E Peterson; Marc O Wright; Lance R Peterson
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Performance of three generations of Xpert MRSA in routine practice: approaching the aim?

Authors:  H Jacqmin; A Schuermans; S Desmet; J Verhaegen; V Saegeman
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Veterans Affairs initiative to prevent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.

Authors:  Rajiv Jain; Stephen M Kralovic; Martin E Evans; Meredith Ambrose; Loretta A Simbartl; D Scott Obrosky; Marta L Render; Ron W Freyberg; John A Jernigan; Robert R Muder; LaToya J Miller; Gary A Roselle
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Evaluation of BD Max StaphSR and BD Max MRSAXT Assays Using ESwab-Collected Specimens.

Authors:  Suzane Silbert; Carly Kubasek; Faris Galambo; Elaine Vendrone; Raymond Widen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carrying the novel mecC gene in Denmark corroborates a zoonotic reservoir with transmission to humans.

Authors:  A Petersen; M Stegger; O Heltberg; J Christensen; A Zeuthen; L K Knudsen; T Urth; M Sorum; L Schouls; J Larsen; R Skov; A R Larsen
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 8.067

7.  Comparison of protocols for surveillance of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): medical staff vs ICU patients.

Authors:  Seungok Lee; Yeon-Joon Park; Eun-Jee Oh; Jimin Kahng; Jin Hong Yoo; In-Hee Jeong; Young-Mi Kwon; Kyungja Han
Journal:  Ann Clin Lab Sci       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.256

8.  Comparative evaluation of two fully-automated real-time PCR methods for MRSA admission screening in a tertiary-care hospital.

Authors:  N J Hos; P Wiegel; J Fischer; G Plum
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2016-06-04       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Performance of BD Max StaphSR for Screening of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolates among a Contemporary and Diverse Collection from 146 Institutions Located in Nine U.S. Census Regions: Prevalence of mecA Dropout Mutants.

Authors:  Rodrigo E Mendes; Amy A Watters; Paul R Rhomberg; David J Farrell; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 10.  Clinical effectiveness of rapid tests for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in hospitalized patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Julie Polisena; Stella Chen; Karen Cimon; Sarah McGill; Kevin Forward; Michael Gardam
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2011-12-12       Impact factor: 3.090

View more
  5 in total

Review 1.  Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry for the Rapid Detection of Antimicrobial Resistance Mechanisms and Beyond.

Authors:  Marina Oviaño; Germán Bou
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  A 'culture' shift: Application of molecular techniques for diagnosing polymicrobial infections.

Authors:  Yi Zhang; Anne Hu; Nadya Andini; Samuel Yang
Journal:  Biotechnol Adv       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 14.227

3.  Practical Comparison of the BioFire FilmArray Pneumonia Panel to Routine Diagnostic Methods and Potential Impact on Antimicrobial Stewardship in Adult Hospitalized Patients with Lower Respiratory Tract Infections.

Authors:  Blake W Buchan; Sam Windham; Joan-Miquel Balada-Llasat; Amy Leber; Amanda Harrington; Ryan Relich; Caitlin Murphy; Jennifer Dien Bard; Samia Naccache; Shira Ronen; Amanda Hopp; Derya Mahmutoglu; Matthew L Faron; Nathan A Ledeboer; Amanda Carroll; Hannah Stone; Oluseun Akerele; Kathy Everhart; Andrew Bonwit; Christina Kwong; Rebecca Buckner; Del Warren; Randal Fowler; Sukantha Chandrasekaran; Holly Huse; Shelley Campeau; Romney Humphries; Corrin Graue; Angela Huang
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clinical Relevance of Xpert MRSA/SA in Guiding Therapeutic Decisions for Staphylococcal Infections: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Analysis.

Authors:  Suvash Chandra Ojha; Ke Chen; Changfeng Sun; Sarfraz Ahmed; Yun-Jian Sheng; Cun-Liang Deng
Journal:  Infect Dis Ther       Date:  2022-04-22

5.  Development and Evaluation of a Sensitive Bacteriophage-Based MRSA Diagnostic Screen.

Authors:  Matthew Brown; Wendy Hahn; Bryant Bailey; Alex Hall; Gema Rodriguez; Henriett Zahn; Marcia Eisenberg; Stephen Erickson
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2020-06-11       Impact factor: 5.048

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.