Literature DB >> 17318480

Comparison of an enrichment broth-enhanced commercial PCR procedure versus bacteriological culture for separating non-colonized from suspected or colonized MRSA individuals.

J H T Wagenvoort1, M F H A van de Cruijs, C T M Meuwissen, J M H Gronenschild, E I G B De Brauwer.   

Abstract

The aim of the study presented here was to evaluate an enrichment broth-enhanced commercial PCR procedure for excluding the presence of meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in patient samples in less than 36 h. In The Netherlands to date, all MRSA epidemics have been successfully controlled with the Dutch search-and-destroy policy. However, PCR facilitates more rapid screening for MRSA than traditional culture. One commercial PCR option is the hyplex StaphyloResist(R) PCR assay (Biologische Analysensystem GmbH, Lich, Germany), which detects Staphylococcus aureus and the mecA gene in MRSA as well as in coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). This assay was used to test a total of 939 specimens obtained from 346 individuals. Following resolution of all discrepancies, the prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) for all separate specimens were 9.0, 97.6, 83.7, 37.4 and 99.7%, respectively, and for specimens grouped according to daily episode submitted per individual, they were 7.5, 97.4, 77.2, 26.2 and 99.7%, respectively. These results led to the introduction of this PCR into the hospital laboratory's routine for the purpose outlined above.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17318480     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-007-0269-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  10 in total

1.  Dutch measures to control MRSA and the expanding European Union.

Authors:  J.H.T. Wagenvoort
Journal:  Euro Surveill       Date:  2000-03

2.  Does nasal cocolonization by methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci and methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strains occur frequently enough to represent a risk of false-positive methicillin-resistant S. aureus determinations by molecular methods?

Authors:  Karsten Becker; Isabelle Pagnier; Brigitte Schuhen; Frauke Wenzelburger; Alexander W Friedrich; Frank Kipp; Georg Peters; Christof von Eiff
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Risk of re-introduction of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus into the hospital by intrafamilial spread from and to healthcare workers.

Authors:  J H T Wagenvoort; E I G B De Brauwer; M L H Sijstermans; H M J Toenbreker
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from nasal swab specimens by a real-time PCR assay.

Authors:  David K Warren; Robert S Liao; Liana R Merz; Michael Eveland; W Michael Dunne
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage in less than 1 hour during a hospital surveillance program.

Authors:  Ann Huletsky; Pierre Lebel; Francois J Picard; Marthe Bernier; Martin Gagnon; Nathalie Boucher; Michel G Bergeron
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 9.079

6.  Multiplex PCR-ELISA for direct detection of MRSA in nasal swabs advantageous for rapid identification of non-MRSA carriers.

Authors:  G Daeschlein; O Assadian; F Daxboeck; A Kramer
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.267

7.  Development of a real-time PCR assay for rapid identification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from clinical samples.

Authors:  Ralf M Hagen; Irene Seegmüller; Jila Navai; Ines Kappstein; Norbert Lehn; Thomas Miethke
Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.473

8.  Optimization of detection and yield of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus phage type III-29.

Authors:  J H Wagenvoort; T J Werink; J M Gronenschild; B I Davies
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 3.254

9.  Use of broth enrichment and real-time PCR to exclude the presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in clinical samples: a sensitive screening approach.

Authors:  P Nilsson; H Alexandersson; T Ripa
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 10.  Guidelines for the laboratory diagnosis and susceptibility testing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Authors:  Derek F J Brown; David I Edwards; Peter M Hawkey; Donald Morrison; Geoffrey L Ridgway; Kevin J Towner; Michael W D Wren
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2005-11-17       Impact factor: 5.790

  10 in total
  6 in total

Review 1.  Current trends in rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and glycopeptide-resistant enterococcus species.

Authors:  Surbhi Malhotra-Kumar; Kelly Haccuria; Mindy Michiels; Margareta Ieven; Claire Poyart; Waleria Hryniewicz; Herman Goossens
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-03-05       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Transmission rates, screening methods and costs of MRSA--a systematic literature review related to the prevalence in Germany.

Authors:  A Tübbicke; C Hübner; A Kramer; N-O Hübner; S Fleßa
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Clinical application of real-time PCR to screening critically ill and emergency-care surgical patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a quantitative analytical study.

Authors:  M Trent Herdman; Duncan Wyncoll; Eugene Halligan; Penelope R Cliff; Gary French; Jonathan D Edgeworth
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2009-10-21       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Rapid diagnostics for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: current status.

Authors:  Karen C Carroll
Journal:  Mol Diagn Ther       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.074

5.  Epidemiology of MRSA and current strategies in Europe and Japan.

Authors:  Axel Kramer; Hans Wagenvoort; Christina Ahrén; Inka Daniels-Haardt; Philippe Hartemann; Hiro Kobayashi; Andrea Kurcz; Juan Picazo; Gaetano Privitera; Ojan Assadian
Journal:  GMS Krankenhhyg Interdiszip       Date:  2010-02-10

6.  Reductions in workload and reporting time by use of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus screening with MRSASelect medium compared to mannitol-salt medium supplemented with oxacillin.

Authors:  Philippe R S Lagacé-Wiens; Michelle J Alfa; Kanchana Manickam; Godfrey K M Harding
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 5.948

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.