Literature DB >> 15026971

Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits.

Mark W Blows1, Stephen F Chenoweth, Emma Hine.   

Abstract

Stabilizing selection has been predicted to change genetic variances and covariances so that the orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix (G) becomes aligned with the orientation of the fitness surface, but it is less clear how directional selection may change G. Here we develop statistical approaches to the comparison of G with vectors of linear and nonlinear selection. We apply these approaches to a set of male sexually selected cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs) of Drosophila serrata. Even though male CHCs displayed substantial additive genetic variance, more than 99% of the genetic variance was orientated 74.9 degrees away from the vector of linear sexual selection, suggesting that open-ended female preferences may greatly reduce genetic variation in male display traits. Although the orientation of G and the fitness surface were found to differ significantly, the similarity present in eigenstructure was a consequence of traits under weak linear selection and strong nonlinear (convex) selection. Associating the eigenstructure of G with vectors of linear and nonlinear selection may provide a way of determining what long-term changes in G may be generated by the processes of natural and sexual selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15026971     DOI: 10.1086/381941

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  60 in total

1.  Simultaneous Estimation of Additive and Mutational Genetic Variance in an Outbred Population of Drosophila serrata.

Authors:  Katrina McGuigan; J David Aguirre; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Genetic variance in female condition predicts indirect genetic variance in male sexual display traits.

Authors:  Donna Petfield; Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-04-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Size correction: comparing morphological traits among populations and environments.

Authors:  Michael W McCoy; Benjamin M Bolker; Craig W Osenberg; Benjamin G Miner; James R Vonesh
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2006-04-08       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Neutral evolution of multiple quantitative characters: a genealogical approach.

Authors:  Cortland K Griswold; Benjamin Logsdon; Richard Gomulkiewicz
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-03-04       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 5.  Hormone-mediated suites as adaptations and evolutionary constraints.

Authors:  Joel W McGlothlin; Ellen D Ketterson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2008-05-12       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Evolution of frequency-dependent mate choice: keeping up with fashion trends.

Authors:  Hanna Kokko; Michael D Jennions; Anne Houde
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 7.  Maintenance of genetic variation in sexual ornaments: a review of the mechanisms.

Authors:  Jacek Radwan
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2007-09-15       Impact factor: 1.082

8.  Determining the effective dimensionality of the genetic variance-covariance matrix.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2006-03-17       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Conspecific density determines the magnitude and character of predator-induced phenotype.

Authors:  Michael W McCoy
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Limited plasticity in the phenotypic variance-covariance matrix for male advertisement calls in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus.

Authors:  W R Pitchers; R Brooks; M D Jennions; T Tregenza; I Dworkin; J Hunt
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.