Literature DB >> 18194086

MIPoD: a hypothesis-testing framework for microevolutionary inference from patterns of divergence.

Paul A Hohenlohe1, Stevan J Arnold.   

Abstract

Despite the many triumphs of comparative biology during the past few decades, the field has remained strangely divorced from evolutionary genetics. In particular, comparative methods have failed to incorporate multivariate process models of microevolution that include genetic constraint in the form of the G matrix. Here we explore the insights that might be gained by such an analysis. A neutral model of evolution by genetic drift that depends on effective population size and the G matrix predicts a probability distribution for divergence of population trait means on a phylogeny. Use of a maximum likelihood (ML) framework then allows us to compare independent direct estimates of G with the ML estimates based on the observed pattern of trait divergence among taxa. We assess the departure from neutrality, and thus the role of different types of selection and other forces, in a stepwise hypothesis-testing procedure based on parameters for the size, shape, and orientation of G. We illustrate our approach with a test case of data on vertebral number evolution in garter snakes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18194086      PMCID: PMC2432089          DOI: 10.1086/527498

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  63 in total

Review 1.  The evolution of the G matrix: selection or drift?

Authors:  D Roff
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Evolution of dietary specialization and chemical defense in poison frogs (Dendrobatidae): a comparative analysis.

Authors:  Catherine R Darst; Pablo A Menéndez-Guerrero; Luis A Coloma; David C Cannatella
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  The maintenance of genetic variability by mutation in a polygenic character with linked loci.

Authors:  R Lande
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  A model for optimal reaction norms: the case of the pregnant garter snake and her temperature-sensitive embryos.

Authors:  Stevan J Arnold; Charles R Peterson
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  RATE TESTS FOR SELECTION ON QUANTITATIVE CHARACTERS DURING MACROEVOLUTION AND MICROEVOLUTION.

Authors:  Michael Turelli; John H Gillespie; Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION BY NEUTRAL MUTATION.

Authors:  Michael Lynch; William G Hill
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  THE KLUGE-KERFOOT PHENOMENON-A STATISTICAL ARTIFACT.

Authors:  F James Rohlf; Amy Jean Gilmartin; Gene Hart
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  METHODS FOR THE ANALYSIS OF COMPARATIVE DATA IN EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  NATURAL SELECTION AND RANDOM GENETIC DRIFT IN PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Discerning evolutionary processes in patterns of tamarin (genus Saguinus) craniofacial variation.

Authors:  Rebecca Rogers Ackermann; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.868

View more
  20 in total

1.  MIPoD: a hypothesis-testing framework for microevolutionary inference from patterns of divergence.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.926

2.  Characterizing the evolution of genetic variance using genetic covariance tensors.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  A new method to uncover signatures of divergent and stabilizing selection in quantitative traits.

Authors:  Otso Ovaskainen; Markku Karhunen; Chaozhi Zheng; José Manuel Cano Arias; Juha Merilä
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-08-11       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Genetic approaches in comparative and evolutionary physiology.

Authors:  Jay F Storz; Jamie T Bridgham; Scott A Kelly; Theodore Garland
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Directional Selection Rather Than Functional Constraints Can Shape the G Matrix in Rapidly Adapting Asexuals.

Authors:  Kevin Gomez; Jason Bertram; Joanna Masel
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Rate of evolutionary change in cranial morphology of the marsupial genus Monodelphis is constrained by the availability of additive genetic variation.

Authors:  A Porto; H Sebastião; S E Pavan; J L VandeBerg; G Marroig; J M Cheverud
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Directional selection effects on patterns of phenotypic (co)variation in wild populations.

Authors:  A P A Assis; J L Patton; A Hubbe; G Marroig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Algorithmic approaches to aid species' delimitation in multidimensional morphospace.

Authors:  Thomas H G Ezard; Paul N Pearson; Andy Purvis
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2010-06-11       Impact factor: 3.260

9.  Experimental analysis of multivariate female choice in gray treefrogs (Hyla versicolor): evidence for directional and stabilizing selection.

Authors:  H Carl Gerhardt; Robert Brooks
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Understanding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix.

Authors:  Stevan J Arnold; Reinhard Bürger; Paul A Hohenlohe; Beverley C Ajie; Adam G Jones
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.694

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.