Literature DB >> 11842405

Discerning evolutionary processes in patterns of tamarin (genus Saguinus) craniofacial variation.

Rebecca Rogers Ackermann1, James M Cheverud.   

Abstract

Quantitative genetic theory specifies evolutionary expectations for morphological diversification by genetic drift in a monophyletic clade. If genetic drift is responsible for the evolutionary morphological diversification of a clade, patterns of within- and between-taxon morphological variance/covariance should be proportional. We tested for proportionality of within- and between-species craniofacial morphological variation in 12 species of tamarins (genus Saguinus). We found that within- and between-taxon morphological variations across the entire genus were not proportional, and hence not likely to be due to genetic drift alone. The primary deviation from proportionality is that size and size-related shape in the cranium is more variable relative to other aspects of cranial morphology than expected under genetic drift, suggesting differential size selection between the two major clades, the small-bodied and large-bodied tamarins. Within each of these major clades, most of the interspecific variation is consistent with the pattern expected under genetic drift, although specific contrasts may indicate the involvement of differential selection. Morphological distances among taxa do not correspond very closely to the phylogeny derived from mtDNA. In particular, S. oedipus and S. geoffroyi are very distinct morphologically from the rest of the tamarins, although they are phylogenetically the sister clade to a clade containing S. midas and S. bicolor. Morphological similarity is not a good guide to phylogenetic affinity in the tamarins, especially with regard to deeper nodes in the phylogenetic tree. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11842405     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.10038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  16 in total

1.  Modularity in the mammalian dentition: mice and monkeys share a common dental genetic architecture.

Authors:  Leslea J Hlusko; Richard D Sage; Michael C Mahaney
Journal:  J Exp Zool B Mol Dev Evol       Date:  2011-01-15       Impact factor: 2.656

2.  Detecting genetic drift versus selection in human evolution.

Authors:  Rebecca Rogers Ackermann; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  MIPoD: a hypothesis-testing framework for microevolutionary inference from patterns of divergence.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Nasal airflow simulations suggest convergent adaptation in Neanderthals and modern humans.

Authors:  S de Azevedo; M F González; C Cintas; V Ramallo; M Quinto-Sánchez; F Márquez; T Hünemeier; C Paschetta; A Ruderman; P Navarro; B A Pazos; C C Silva de Cerqueira; O Velan; F Ramírez-Rozzi; N Calvo; H G Castro; R R Paz; R González-José
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  High evolutionary constraints limited adaptive responses to past climate changes in toad skulls.

Authors:  Monique Nouailhetas Simon; Fabio Andrade Machado; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-10-26       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Rate of evolutionary change in cranial morphology of the marsupial genus Monodelphis is constrained by the availability of additive genetic variation.

Authors:  A Porto; H Sebastião; S E Pavan; J L VandeBerg; G Marroig; J M Cheverud
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  Phylogenetic ANOVA: The Expression Variance and Evolution Model for Quantitative Trait Evolution.

Authors:  Rori V Rohlfs; Rasmus Nielsen
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 15.683

8.  Close correspondence between quantitative- and molecular-genetic divergence times for Neandertals and modern humans.

Authors:  Timothy D Weaver; Charles C Roseman; Chris B Stringer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Quantitative Genetics, Pleiotropy, and Morphological Integration in the Dentition of Papio hamadryas.

Authors:  Leslea J Hlusko; Michael C Mahaney
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.119

10.  The role of genetic drift in shaping modern human cranial evolution: a test using microevolutionary modeling.

Authors:  Heather F Smith
Journal:  Int J Evol Biol       Date:  2011-03-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.