Literature DB >> 27881744

Directional selection effects on patterns of phenotypic (co)variation in wild populations.

A P A Assis1, J L Patton2, A Hubbe3, G Marroig4.   

Abstract

Phenotypic (co)variation is a prerequisite for evolutionary change, and understanding how (co)variation evolves is of crucial importance to the biological sciences. Theoretical models predict that under directional selection, phenotypic (co)variation should evolve in step with the underlying adaptive landscape, increasing the degree of correlation among co-selected traits as well as the amount of genetic variance in the direction of selection. Whether either of these outcomes occurs in natural populations is an open question and thus an important gap in evolutionary theory. Here, we documented changes in the phenotypic (co)variation structure in two separate natural populations in each of two chipmunk species (Tamias alpinus and T. speciosus) undergoing directional selection. In populations where selection was strongest (those of T. alpinus), we observed changes, at least for one population, in phenotypic (co)variation that matched theoretical expectations, namely an increase of both phenotypic integration and (co)variance in the direction of selection and a re-alignment of the major axis of variation with the selection gradient.
© 2016 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  P-matrix; Tamias; adaptive landscape; chipmunks; genotype–phenotype map; quantitative genetics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27881744      PMCID: PMC5136582          DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.1615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8452            Impact factor:   5.349


  41 in total

1.  Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Stevan J Arnold; Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Elimination of a genetic correlation between the sexes via artificial correlational selection.

Authors:  Lynda F Delph; Janet C Steven; Ingrid A Anderson; Christopher R Herlihy; Edmund D Brodie
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2011-06-13       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Evolution of adaptive phenotypic variation patterns by direct selection for evolvability.

Authors:  Mihaela Pavlicev; James M Cheverud; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Covariance structure in the skull of Catarrhini: a case of pattern stasis and magnitude evolution.

Authors:  Felipe Bandoni de Oliveira; Arthur Porto; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  J Hum Evol       Date:  2009-04-11       Impact factor: 3.895

5.  Measuring and comparing evolvability and constraint in multivariate characters.

Authors:  T F Hansen; D Houle
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 2.411

6.  PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS OF PHENOTYPIC COVARIANCE STRUCTURE. I. CONTRASTING RESULTS FROM MATRIX CORRELATION AND COMMON PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSES.

Authors:  Scott J Steppan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  ADAPTIVE RADIATION ALONG GENETIC LINES OF LEAST RESISTANCE.

Authors:  Dolph Schluter
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.694

8.  A test of the hypothesis that correlational selection generates genetic correlations.

Authors:  Derek A Roff; Daphne J Fairbairn
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF MORPHOLOGICAL DIFFERENTIATION IN PEROMYSCUS. I. TESTS OF THE HOMOGENEITY OF GENETIC COVARIANCE STRUCTURE AMONG SPECIES AND SUBSPECIES.

Authors:  David Lofsvold
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  Morphological and dietary responses of chipmunks to a century of climate change.

Authors:  Rachel E Walsh; Ana Paula Aprígio Assis; James L Patton; Gabriel Marroig; Todd E Dawson; Eileen A Lacey
Journal:  Glob Chang Biol       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 10.863

View more
  10 in total

1.  Directional selection effects on patterns of phenotypic (co)variation in wild populations.

Authors:  A P A Assis; J L Patton; A Hubbe; G Marroig
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Measuring the magnitude of morphological integration: The effect of differences in morphometric representations and the inclusion of size.

Authors:  Fabio A Machado; Alex Hubbe; Diogo Melo; Arthur Porto; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2019-10-28       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  A method to predict the response to directional selection using a Kalman filter.

Authors:  Lisandro Milocco; Isaac Salazar-Ciudad
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 12.779

4.  The evolution of phenotypic integration: How directional selection reshapes covariation in mice.

Authors:  Anna Penna; Diogo Melo; Sandra Bernardi; Maria Inés Oyarzabal; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Variation in brown rat cranial shape shows directional selection over 120 years in New York City.

Authors:  Emily E Puckett; Emma Sherratt; Matthew Combs; Elizabeth J Carlen; William Harcourt-Smith; Jason Munshi-South
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 2.912

6.  The influence of spatially heterogeneous anthropogenic change on bill size evolution in a coastal songbird.

Authors:  Phred M Benham; Rauri C K Bowie
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 5.183

7.  Molecular tracking and prevalence of the red colour morph restricted to a harvested leopard population in South Africa.

Authors:  Laura Tensen; John Power; Gerrie Camacho; Raquel Godinho; Bettine Jansen van Vuuren; Klaus Fischer
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2022-06-08       Impact factor: 4.929

8.  Long-term research and hierarchical models reveal consistent fitness costs of being the last egg in a clutch.

Authors:  Cheyenne R Acevedo; Thomas V Riecke; Alan G Leach; Madeleine G Lohman; Perry J Williams; James S Sedinger
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2020-04-22       Impact factor: 5.091

9.  Morphological variation under domestication: how variable are chickens?

Authors:  Madlen Stange; Daniel Núñez-León; Marcelo R Sánchez-Villagra; Per Jensen; Laura A B Wilson
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 2.963

10.  Temporal genomic contrasts reveal rapid evolutionary responses in an alpine mammal during recent climate change.

Authors:  Ke Bi; Tyler Linderoth; Sonal Singhal; Dan Vanderpool; James L Patton; Rasmus Nielsen; Craig Moritz; Jeffrey M Good
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 5.917

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.