Literature DB >> 10762382

The evolution of the G matrix: selection or drift?

D Roff1.   

Abstract

The evolution of quantitative characters can be described by the equation Deltaz=GP-1S where Deltaz is the vector of mean responses, G is the matrix of additive genetic variances and covariances, P is the matrix of phenotypic variances and covariances and S is the vector of selection differentials. This equation can be used to predict changes in trait values or to retrospectively estimate the selection gradient and is thus a central equation of evolutionary quantitative genetics. Genetic variances and covariances will be reduced by stabilizing selection, directional selection and drift, and increased by mutation. Changes in trait values resulting from directional selection that are comparable with differences observed among species are readily obtainable in short geological time spans (<5000 generations) with selection intensities so small that they would have an insignificant effect on the G matrix (of course it is possible that such changes came about by strong selection over a few generations, followed by long periods of stasis; there is insufficient evidence to presently distinguish these two possibilities). On the other hand, observed effective population sizes are sufficiently small that considerable changes in G can be expected from drift alone. The action of drift can be distinguished from selection because the former produces a proportional change in G whereas the latter, in general, will not. A survey of studies examining variation in G suggests that the null hypothesis that most of the variation can be attributed to drift rather than selection cannot be rejected. However, more research on the predicted statistical distribution of G as a result of selection and/or drift is required and further development of statistical tests to distinguish these two forces needs to be made.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10762382     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00695.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  29 in total

1.  Inbreeding changes the shape of the genetic covariance matrix in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  P C Phillips; M C Whitlock; K Fowler
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings.

Authors:  Patricia Beldade; Kees Koops; Paul M Brakefield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-10-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Comparing G matrices: are common principal components informative?

Authors:  Jason G Mezey; David Houle
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Developmental plasticity in covariance structure of the skull: effects of prenatal stress.

Authors:  Paula N Gonzalez; Benedikt Hallgrímsson; Evelia E Oyhenart
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 5.  Environmental quality and evolutionary potential: lessons from wild populations.

Authors:  Anne Charmantier; Dany Garant
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-07-22       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  MIPoD: a hypothesis-testing framework for microevolutionary inference from patterns of divergence.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.926

7.  Multivariate QST-FST comparisons: a neutrality test for the evolution of the g matrix in structured populations.

Authors:  Guillaume Martin; Elodie Chapuis; Jérôme Goudet
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-02-03       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Characterizing the evolution of genetic variance using genetic covariance tensors.

Authors:  Emma Hine; Stephen F Chenoweth; Howard D Rundle; Mark W Blows
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

9.  Effects of selection and drift on G matrix evolution in a heterogeneous environment: a multivariate Qst-Fst Test with the freshwater snail Galba truncatula.

Authors:  Elodie Chapuis; Guillaume Martin; Jérôme Goudet
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Limited plasticity in the phenotypic variance-covariance matrix for male advertisement calls in the black field cricket, Teleogryllus commodus.

Authors:  W R Pitchers; R Brooks; M D Jennions; T Tregenza; I Dworkin; J Hunt
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2013-03-27       Impact factor: 2.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.