Literature DB >> 28556213

PHENOTYPIC EVOLUTION BY NEUTRAL MUTATION.

Michael Lynch1, William G Hill2.   

Abstract

A general model is developed for predicting the genetic variance within populations and the rate of divergence of population mean phenotypes for quantitative traits under the joint operation of random sampling drift and mutation in the absence of selection. In addition to incorporating the dominance effects of mutant alleles, the model yields some insight into the effects of linkage and the mating system on the mutational production of quantitative-genetic variation. Despite these additional and potentially serious complications, it is found that, for small populations, the simple predictions obtained by previous investigators using additive-genetic models hold reasonably well. Even after accounting for dominance and linkage, the equilibrium level of genetic variance is unlikely to be much less than 2NVm or to be more than 4NVm , where N is the effective population size and Vm is the new variance from mutation appearing each generation. The rate of increase of the between-line variance per generation ultimately equals 2Vm regardless of population size, although the time to attain the asymptotic rate is proportional to N. Expressions are presented for the rate of approach to the equilibrium level of genetic variance and for the expected variance of the within-population and between-population genetic variances. The relevance of the derived model, which amounts to a generalization of the neutral theory to the phenotypic level, is discussed in the context of the detection of natural selection, the maintenance of pure lines for biomedical and agricultural purposes, the development of genetic conservation programs, and the design of indices of morphological distance between species. © 1986 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Year:  1986        PMID: 28556213     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00561.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  46 in total

1.  The population genetics of mutations: good, bad and indifferent.

Authors:  Laurence Loewe; William G Hill
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Coalescence with Background and Balancing Selection in Systems with Bi- and Uniparental Reproduction: Contrasting Partial Asexuality and Selfing.

Authors:  Aneil F Agrawal; Matthew Hartfield
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Decoupling the Variances of Heterosis and Inbreeding Effects Is Evidenced in Yeast's Life-History and Proteomic Traits.

Authors:  Marianyela Petrizzelli; Dominique de Vienne; Christine Dillmann
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Predictions of patterns of response to artificial selection in lines derived from natural populations.

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang; William G Hill
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Rapid evolution of expression and regulatory divergences after yeast gene duplication.

Authors:  Xun Gu; Zhongqi Zhang; Wei Huang
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity.

Authors:  Michael Lynch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-05-09       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  MIPoD: a hypothesis-testing framework for microevolutionary inference from patterns of divergence.

Authors:  Paul A Hohenlohe; Stevan J Arnold
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.926

Review 8.  Analysis and implications of mutational variation.

Authors:  Peter D Keightley; Daniel L Halligan
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.082

9.  Increase in quantitative variation after exposure to environmental stresses and/or introduction of a major mutation: G x E interaction and epistasis or canalization?

Authors:  Xu-Sheng Zhang
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-24       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Mutational variance for pupa weight in Tribolium castaneum.

Authors:  F D Enfield; O Braskerud
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 5.699

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.