Literature DB >> 18973631

Understanding the evolution and stability of the G-matrix.

Stevan J Arnold1, Reinhard Bürger, Paul A Hohenlohe, Beverley C Ajie, Adam G Jones.   

Abstract

The G-matrix summarizes the inheritance of multiple, phenotypic traits. The stability and evolution of this matrix are important issues because they affect our ability to predict how the phenotypic traits evolve by selection and drift. Despite the centrality of these issues, comparative, experimental, and analytical approaches to understanding the stability and evolution of the G-matrix have met with limited success. Nevertheless, empirical studies often find that certain structural features of the matrix are remarkably constant, suggesting that persistent selection regimes or other factors promote stability. On the theoretical side, no one has been able to derive equations that would relate stability of the G-matrix to selection regimes, population size, migration, or to the details of genetic architecture. Recent simulation studies of evolving G-matrices offer solutions to some of these problems, as well as a deeper, synthetic understanding of both the G-matrix and adaptive radiations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18973631      PMCID: PMC3229175          DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00472.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  40 in total

Review 1.  The adaptive landscape as a conceptual bridge between micro- and macroevolution.

Authors:  S J Arnold; M E Pfrender; A G Jones
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.082

2.  Stability of the G-matrix in a population experiencing pleiotropic mutation, stabilizing selection, and genetic drift.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Stevan J Arnold; Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Did natural selection or genetic drift produce the cranial diversification of neotropical monkeys?

Authors:  Gabriel Marroig; James M Cheverud
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 3.926

4.  Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits.

Authors:  Mark W Blows; Stephen F Chenoweth; Emma Hine
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 3.926

5.  The G matrix under fluctuating correlational mutation and selection.

Authors:  Liam J Revell
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.694

6.  Expected relative fitness and the adaptive topography of fluctuating selection.

Authors:  Russell Lande
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.694

7.  Visualizing and quantifying natural selection.

Authors:  E D Brodie; A J Moore; F J Janzen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 8.  Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components.

Authors:  T A Mousseau; D A Roff
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 3.821

9.  On the distribution of the mean and variance of a quantitative trait under mutation-selection-drift balance.

Authors:  R Bürger; R Lande
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  The mutation matrix and the evolution of evolvability.

Authors:  Adam G Jones; Stevan J Arnold; Reinhard Bürger
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.694

View more
  79 in total

1.  Coevolution in multidimensional trait space favours escape from parasites and pathogens.

Authors:  R Tucker Gilman; Scott L Nuismer; Dwueng-Chwuan Jhwueng
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-04       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Evolution of the additive genetic variance-covariance matrix under continuous directional selection on a complex behavioural phenotype.

Authors:  Vincent Careau; Matthew E Wolak; Patrick A Carter; Theodore Garland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Covariation between human pelvis shape, stature, and head size alleviates the obstetric dilemma.

Authors:  Barbara Fischer; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  The beak of the other finch: coevolution of genetic covariance structure and developmental modularity during adaptive evolution.

Authors:  Alexander V Badyaev
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Repeated modification of early limb morphogenesis programmes underlies the convergence of relative limb length in Anolis lizards.

Authors:  Thomas J Sanger; Liam J Revell; Jeremy J Gibson-Brown; Jonathan B Losos
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Genetic approaches in comparative and evolutionary physiology.

Authors:  Jay F Storz; Jamie T Bridgham; Scott A Kelly; Theodore Garland
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Directional selection can drive the evolution of modularity in complex traits.

Authors:  Diogo Melo; Gabriel Marroig
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-12-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Trait dimensionality explains widespread variation in local adaptation.

Authors:  Ailene MacPherson; Paul A Hohenlohe; Scott L Nuismer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Genetic regulatory network motifs constrain adaptation through curvature in the landscape of mutational (co)variance.

Authors:  Tyler D Hether; Paul A Hohenlohe
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 3.694

10.  The effects of resource availability and the demographic transition on the genetic correlation between number of children and grandchildren in humans.

Authors:  E Bolund; V Lummaa
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.