Literature DB >> 18189114

The effects of brief and extended stimulus availability on preference.

Jody Steinhilber1, Cammarie Johnson.   

Abstract

The effects of stimulus availability on preference were evaluated using two conditions of a modified preference assessment. Different preference hierarchies were found in 15-s access conditions than in 15-min access conditions. Subsequent comparisons of a short-availability high-preference stimulus and a long-availability high-preference stimulus verified differential preferences for stimuli based on duration of availability.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18189114      PMCID: PMC2078565          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.2007.767-772

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  7 in total

1.  Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata; J Conners; M D Wallace
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

2.  Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.

Authors:  L P Hagopian; K S Rush; A B Lewin; E S Long
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

3.  Response-restriction analysis: I. Assessment of activity preferences.

Authors:  Gregory P Hanley; Brian A Iwata; Jana S Lindberg; Juliet Conners
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

4.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

5.  Evaluation of a brief stimulus preference assessment.

Authors:  H S Roane; T R Vollmer; J E Ringdahl; B A Marcus
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998

6.  Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification.

Authors:  W W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; A Amari
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  1996-07

7.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996
  7 in total
  5 in total

1.  Predicting preference for items during periods of extended access based on early response allocation.

Authors:  John T Rapp; Nairim C Rojas; Amanda M Colby-Dirksen; Greg J Swanson; Kendra L Marvin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2010

2.  The Impact of Stimulus Presentation and Size on Preference.

Authors:  James W Moore; Keith C Radley; Evan H Dart; Heather M Whipple; Emily J Ness; Ashley N Murphy; Chris Furlow; Joy K Wimberly; Ashley Smith
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2016-09-21

3.  Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: evaluations of efficacy and preference.

Authors:  Iser G DeLeon; Julie A Chase; Michelle A Frank-Crawford; Abbey B Carreau-Webster; Mandy M Triggs; Christopher E Bullock; Heather K Jennett
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2014-04-30

4.  Parametric analysis of presession exposure to edible and nonedible stimuli.

Authors:  Jolene R Sy; John C Borrero
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2009

Review 5.  Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.

Authors:  Jordan D Lill; Mark D Shriver; Keith D Allen
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2021-04-30
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.