Literature DB >> 10201108

Examination of ambiguous stimulus preferences with duration-based measures.

I G DeLeon1, B A Iwata, J Conners, M D Wallace.   

Abstract

Items that produced ambiguous results in an approach-based preference assessment were reassessed using a duration-based assessment. The reinforcing effects of three items on free-operant responding were subsequently tested. The results suggested that the duration-based assessment produced slightly more differentiated results and that predictions about reinforcer value, based on this assessment, were accurate.

Mesh：

Year:  1999        PMID： 10201108      PMCID： PMC1284545          DOI： 10.1901/jaba.1999.32-111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN： 0021-8855


  4 in total

1.  A comparison of two approaches for identifying reinforcers for persons with severe and profound disabilities.

Authors:  W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; L P Hagopian; J C Owens; I Slevin
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1992

2.  A preliminary procedure for predicting the positive and negative effects of reinforcement-based procedures.

Authors:  C C Piazza; W W Fisher; G P Hanley; K Hilker; K M Derby
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

3.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

4.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985
  4 in total
  15 in total

1.  Effects of reinforcement for alternative behavior during punishment of self-injury.

Authors:  R H Thompson; B A Iwata; J Conners; E M Roscoe
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1999

2.  Effects of increased response effort on self-injury and object manipulation as competing responses.

Authors:  L Zhou; G A Goff
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2000

3.  Evaluating the predictive validity of a single stimulus engagement preference assessment.

Authors:  L P Hagopian; K S Rush; A B Lewin; E S Long
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2001

4.  Treatment efficacy of noncontingent reinforcement during brief and extended application.

Authors:  Jana S Lindberg; Brian A Iwata; Eileen M Roscoe; April S Worsdell; Gregory P Hanley
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2003

5.  Duration-based measures of preference for vocational tasks.

Authors:  April S Worsdell; Brian A Iwata; Michele D Wallace
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2002

6.  Evaluation of the rate of problem behavior maintained by different reinforcers across preference assessments.

Authors:  Soyeon Kang; Mark F O'Reilly; Christina L Fragale; Jeannie M Aguilar; Mandy Rispoli; Russell Lang
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2011

7.  Functional analysis and treatment of arranging and ordering by individuals with an autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Nicole M Rodriguez; Rachel H Thompson; Kevin Schlichenmeyer; Corey S Stocco
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2012

8.  The effects of reinforcement magnitude on functional analysis outcomes.

Authors:  Valerie M Volkert; Dorothea C Lerman; Christina Vorndran
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

9.  The effects of brief and extended stimulus availability on preference.

Authors:  Jody Steinhilber; Cammarie Johnson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

10.  A quantitative review of overjustification effects in persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Authors:  Allison Levy; Iser G DeLeon; Catherine K Martinez; Nathalie Fernandez; Nicholas A Gage; Sigurdur Óli Sigurdsson; Michelle A Frank-Crawford
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2016-10-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.