Literature DB >> 28630822

The Impact of Stimulus Presentation and Size on Preference.

James W Moore1, Keith C Radley1, Evan H Dart1, Heather M Whipple1, Emily J Ness1, Ashley N Murphy1, Chris Furlow1, Joy K Wimberly1, Ashley Smith1.   

Abstract

The impact of stimulus size and presentation on choice during a preference assessment was investigated using a modified multiple-stimulus without replacement (MSWO) technique. Stimuli were either presented with a uniform magnitude, as determined by mass, or in a manner consistent with caregiver report of reinforcer consumption. While both assessment procedures identified the same top three preferred items in three out of five cases, greater variability in the preference rank of less preferred items was observed between assessments.

Keywords:  Caregiver report; Choice; Preference assessment; Reinforce magnitude

Year:  2016        PMID: 28630822      PMCID: PMC5459764          DOI: 10.1007/s40617-016-0148-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Anal Pract        ISSN: 1998-1929


  9 in total

1.  The effects of brief and extended stimulus availability on preference.

Authors:  Jody Steinhilber; Cammarie Johnson
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2007

2.  Integrating caregiver report with systematic choice assessment to enhance reinforcer identification.

Authors:  W W Fisher; C C Piazza; L G Bowman; A Amari
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  1996-07

3.  On the correspondence between preference assessment outcomes and progressive-ratio schedule assessments of stimulus value.

Authors:  Iser G DeLeon; Michelle A Frank; Meagan K Gregory; Melissa J Allman
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2009

4.  Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences.

Authors:  I G DeLeon; B A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1996

5.  Behavioral economics: a tutorial for behavior analysts in practice.

Authors:  Derek D Reed; Christopher R Niileksela; Brent A Kaplan
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2013

6.  Distributed and accumulated reinforcement arrangements: evaluations of efficacy and preference.

Authors:  Iser G DeLeon; Julie A Chase; Michelle A Frank-Crawford; Abbey B Carreau-Webster; Mandy M Triggs; Christopher E Bullock; Heather K Jennett
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2014-04-30

7.  The transformation of consequential functions in accordance with the relational frames of more-than and less-than.

Authors:  Robert Whelan; Dermot Barnes-Holmes; Simon Dymond
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals.

Authors:  G M Pace; M T Ivancic; G L Edwards; B A Iwata; T J Page
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985

9.  Evaluation of reinforcer preferences for profoundly handicapped students.

Authors:  D P Wacker; W K Berg; B Wiggins; M Muldoon; J Cavanaugh
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1985
  9 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Stimulus Preference Assessment Decision-Making System (SPADS): A Decision-Making Model for Practitioners.

Authors:  Jordan D Lill; Mark D Shriver; Keith D Allen
Journal:  Behav Anal Pract       Date:  2021-04-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.