Literature DB >> 18075042

Tissue damage by pulsed electrical stimulation.

A Butterwick1, A Vankov, P Huie, Y Freyvert, D Palanker.   

Abstract

Repeated pulsed electrical stimulation is used in a multitude of neural interfaces; damage resulting from such stimulation was studied as a function of pulse duration, electrode size, and number of pulses using a fluorescent assay on chick chorioallontoic membrane (CAM) in vivo and chick retina in vitro. Data from the chick model were verified by repeating some measurements on porcine retina in-vitro. The electrode size varied from 100 microm to 1 mm, pulse duration from 6 micros to 6 ms, and the number of pulses from 1 to 7500. The threshold current density for damage was independent of electrode size for diameters greater than 300 microm, and scaled as 1/r2 for electrodes smaller than 200 microm. Damage threshold decreased with the number of pulses, dropping by a factor of 14 on the CAM and 7 on the retina as the number of pulses increased from 1 to 50, and remained constant for a higher numbers of pulses. The damage threshold current density on large electrodes scaled with pulse duration as approximately 1/t0.5, characteristic of electroporation. The threshold current density for repeated exposure on the retina varied between 0.061 A/cm2 at 6 ms to 1.3 A/cm2 at 6 micros. The highest ratio of the damage threshold to the stimulation threshold in retinal ganglion cells occurred at pulse durations near chronaxie-around 1.3 ms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18075042     DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2007.908310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  31 in total

1.  Separated interface nerve electrode prevents direct current induced nerve damage.

Authors:  D Michael Ackermann; Niloy Bhadra; Emily L Foldes; Kevin L Kilgore
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2011-01-27       Impact factor: 2.390

2.  Safety of multi-channel stimulation implants: a single blocking capacitor per channel is not sufficient after single-fault failure.

Authors:  Antoine Nonclercq; Laurent Lonys; Anne Vanhoestenberghe; Andreas Demosthenous; Nick Donaldson
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Strength-duration relationship for extracellular neural stimulation: numerical and analytical models.

Authors:  David Boinagrov; Jim Loudin; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Evaluation of Effects of Electrical Stimulation in the Retina with Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  A Gonzalez-Calle; J D Weiland
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2016-08

5.  Upper threshold of extracellular neural stimulation.

Authors:  David Boinagrov; Susanne Pangratz-Fuehrer; Bongsoo Suh; Keith Mathieson; Natasha Naik; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Subretinal electrical stimulation reveals intact network activity in the blind mouse retina.

Authors:  Henrike Stutzki; Florian Helmhold; Max Eickenscheidt; Günther Zeck
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-07-13       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Are long stimulus pulse durations the answer to improving spatial resolution in retinal prostheses?

Authors:  Matthew A Petoe; Mohit N Shivdasani
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-11

8.  Focal electrical stimulation of major ganglion cell types in the primate retina for the design of visual prostheses.

Authors:  Lauren H Jepson; Pawel Hottowy; Keith Mathieson; Deborah E Gunning; Wladyslaw Dabrowski; Alan M Litke; E J Chichilnisky
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Electronic enhancement of tear secretion.

Authors:  Mark Brinton; Jae Lim Chung; Andrea Kossler; Koung Hoon Kook; Jim Loudin; Manfred Franke; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 10.  Electrochemical biofilm control: a review.

Authors:  Sujala T Sultana; Jerome T Babauta; Haluk Beyenal
Journal:  Biofouling       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.209

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.