Literature DB >> 28261012

Evaluation of Effects of Electrical Stimulation in the Retina with Optical Coherence Tomography.

A Gonzalez-Calle1, J D Weiland2.   

Abstract

Retinal prostheses provide the capability to blind patients to detect motion and locate large objects. To avoid activating axons of passage, which can create streak-like perceptions, long pulse stimulation can be used to bypass axons and achieve focal retinal activation. Safety is a concern because long pulses require more charge than short pulses to elicit a response from neural tissue. Future implants will require smaller electrodes to improve resolution, but increased charge density may result, which is another safety concern. We developed a method to study the effects of electrical stimulation in the retina in real time using OCT (Optical Coherence Tomography) imaging combined with micropositioning of a stimulating electrode over the retina in an animal model. When using a 250-micron diameter electrode and stimulating for 30 minutes (frequency: 333 Hz), charge density: 1.22 mC/cm2, we observed an increase in retinal thickness from 154.3 μm ± 7.04 μm to 179.67 μm ± 0.47μm, a 16.66 % ± 5.49% increase compared to baseline. The region of increased thickness extended laterally for 0.56 mm ± 0.009 mm. When stimulating with a charge density of 1.63 mC/cm2, we observed an increase in retinal thickness from 160.3 μm ± 2.05 μm to 190 μm ± 0.81μm, a 19.52 % ± 1.86% increase compared to baseline. The region of increased thickness expanded laterally for 1.27 mm ± 0.19 mm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28261012      PMCID: PMC5325086          DOI: 10.1109/EMBC.2016.7592140

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc        ISSN: 1557-170X


  12 in total

1.  Design of a high-resolution optoelectronic retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Daniel Palanker; Alexander Vankov; Phil Huie; Stephen Baccus
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 5.379

2.  Tissue damage by pulsed electrical stimulation.

Authors:  A Butterwick; A Vankov; P Huie; Y Freyvert; D Palanker
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 4.538

3.  Visual perception in a blind subject with a chronic microelectronic retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Mark S Humayun; James D Weiland; Gildo Y Fujii; Robert Greenberg; Richard Williamson; Jim Little; Brian Mech; Valerie Cimmarusti; Gretchen Van Boemel; Gislin Dagnelie; Eugene de Juan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Continuous electrical stimulation decreases retinal excitability but does not alter retinal morphology.

Authors:  A Ray; E-J Lee; M S Humayun; J D Weiland
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-07-20       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Optical coherence tomography imaging of retinal damage in real time under a stimulus electrode.

Authors:  Ethan Cohen; Anant Agrawal; Megan Connors; Barry Hansen; Hamid Charkhkar; Joshua Pfefer
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Preservation of the inner retina in retinitis pigmentosa. A morphometric analysis.

Authors:  A Santos; M S Humayun; E de Juan; R J Greenburg; M J Marsh; I B Klock; A H Milam
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1997-04

Review 7.  Considerations for safety with chronically implanted nerve electrodes.

Authors:  W F Agnew; D B McCreery
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 8.  Retinal prosthesis.

Authors:  James D Weiland; Mark S Humayun
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2014-04-02       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Predicting visual sensitivity in retinal prosthesis patients.

Authors:  Alan Horsager; Scott H Greenwald; James D Weiland; Mark S Humayun; Robert J Greenberg; Matthew J McMahon; Geoffrey M Boynton; Ione Fine
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2008-12-20       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Improving the spatial resolution of epiretinal implants by increasing stimulus pulse duration.

Authors:  Andrew C Weitz; Devyani Nanduri; Matthew R Behrend; Alejandra Gonzalez-Calle; Robert J Greenberg; Mark S Humayun; Robert H Chow; James D Weiland
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 17.956

View more
  3 in total

1.  Retinal Anatomy and Electrode Array Position in Retinitis Pigmentosa Patients After Argus II Implantation: An International Study.

Authors:  Ninel Z Gregori; Natalia F Callaway; Catherine Hoeppner; Alex Yuan; Aleksandra Rachitskaya; William Feuer; Hossein Ameri; J Fernando Arevalo; Albert J Augustin; David G Birch; Gislin Dagnelie; Salvatore Grisanti; Janet L Davis; Paul Hahn; James T Handa; Allen C Ho; Suber S Huang; Mark S Humayun; Raymond Iezzi; K Thiran Jayasundera; Gregg T Kokame; Byron L Lam; Jennifer I Lim; Naresh Mandava; Sandra R Montezuma; Lisa Olmos de Koo; Peter Szurman; Lejla Vajzovic; Peter Wiedemann; James Weiland; Jiong Yan; David N Zacks
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.258

Review 2.  Electrode Materials for Chronic Electrical Microstimulation.

Authors:  Xin Sally Zheng; Chao Tan; Elisa Castagnola; Xinyan Tracy Cui
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 11.092

3.  Spatial Transcriptomics as a Novel Approach to Redefine Electrical Stimulation Safety.

Authors:  Quentin A Whitsitt; Beomseo Koo; Mahmut Emin Celik; Blake M Evans; James D Weiland; Erin K Purcell
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 5.152

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.