Literature DB >> 20702740

Strength-duration relationship for extracellular neural stimulation: numerical and analytical models.

David Boinagrov1, Jim Loudin, Daniel Palanker.   

Abstract

The strength-duration relationship for extracellular stimulation is often assumed to be similar to the classical intracellular stimulation model, with a slope asymptotically approaching 1/τ at pulse durations shorter than chronaxy. We modeled extracellular neural stimulation numerically and analytically for several cell shapes and types of active membrane properties. The strength-duration relationship was found to differ significantly from classical intracellular models. At pulse durations between 4 μs and 5 ms stimulation is dominated by sodium channels, with a slope of -0.72 in log-log coordinates for the Hodgkin-Huxley ion channel model. At shorter durations potassium channels dominate and slope decreases to -0.13. Therefore the charge per phase is decreasing with decreasing stimulus duration. With pulses shorter than cell polarization time (∼0.1-1 μs), stimulation is dominated by polarization dynamics with a classical -1 slope and the charge per phase becomes constant. It is demonstrated that extracellular stimulation can have not only lower but also upper thresholds and may be impossible below certain pulse durations. In some regimes the extracellular current can hyperpolarize cells, suppressing rather than stimulating spiking behavior. Thresholds for burst stimuli can be either higher or lower than that of a single pulse, depending on pulse duration. The modeled thresholds were found to be comparable to published experimental data. Electroporation thresholds, which limit the range of safe stimulation, were found to exceed stimulation thresholds by about two orders of magnitude. These results provide a biophysical basis for understanding stimulation dynamics and guidance for optimizing the neural stimulation efficacy and safety.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20702740      PMCID: PMC2957463          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00343.2010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  44 in total

1.  A computational model of electrical stimulation of the retinal ganglion cell.

Authors:  R J Greenberg; T J Velte; M S Humayun; G N Scarlatis; E de Juan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.538

2.  A quantitative description of membrane current and its application to conduction and excitation in nerve.

Authors:  A L HODGKIN; A F HUXLEY
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1952-08       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Sensitivity analysis of a model of mammalian neural membrane.

Authors:  C C McIntyre; W M Grill
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.086

4.  Axons, but not cell bodies, are activated by electrical stimulation in cortical gray matter. I. Evidence from chronaxie measurements.

Authors:  L G Nowak; J Bullier
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Impulse encoding mechanisms of ganglion cells in the tiger salamander retina.

Authors:  J F Fohlmeister; R F Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Mechanisms of concerted firing among retinal ganglion cells.

Authors:  I H Brivanlou; D K Warland; M Meister
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  A new bladder stimulator--hand-held controller and miniaturized implant: preliminary results in dogs.

Authors:  M Sawan; F Duval; J S Li; M Hassouna; M M Elhilali
Journal:  Biomed Instrum Technol       Date:  1993 Mar-Apr

8.  A mathematical model of make and break electrical stimulation of cardiac tissue by a unipolar anode or cathode.

Authors:  B J Roth
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Time courses of cell electroporation as revealed by submicrosecond imaging of transmembrane potential.

Authors:  M Hibino; H Itoh; K Kinosita
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  Single channel currents at six microsecond resolution elicited by acetylcholine in mouse myoballs.

Authors:  F Parzefall; R Wilhelm; M Heckmann; J Dudel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  25 in total

1.  Computational modeling of neurons: intensity-duration relationship of extracellular electrical stimulation for changes in intracellular calcium.

Authors:  Robert D Adams; Rebecca K Willits; Amy B Harkins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Reply to Rattay.

Authors:  David Boinagrov; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-15       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Validation of electrical stimulation models: intracellular calcium measurement in three-dimensional scaffolds.

Authors:  Robert D Adams; Brinda Gupta; Amy B Harkins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Upper threshold of extracellular neural stimulation.

Authors:  David Boinagrov; Susanne Pangratz-Fuehrer; Bongsoo Suh; Keith Mathieson; Natasha Naik; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Modified cable equation incorporating transverse polarization of neuronal membranes for accurate coupling of electric fields.

Authors:  Boshuo Wang; Aman S Aberra; Warren M Grill; Angel V Peterchev
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Selectivity of direct and network-mediated stimulation of the retinal ganglion cells with epi-, sub- and intraretinal electrodes.

Authors:  David Boinagrov; Susanne Pangratz-Fuehrer; Georges Goetz; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 5.379

Review 7.  Retinal implants: emergence of a multidisciplinary field.

Authors:  Gislin Dagnelie
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 5.710

8.  Effect of coil orientation on motor-evoked potentials in humans with tetraplegia.

Authors:  Hang Jin Jo; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Monica A Perez
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-09-13       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Avoiding nerve stimulation in irreversible electroporation: a numerical modeling study.

Authors:  Borja Mercadal; Christopher B Arena; Rafael V Davalos; Antoni Ivorra
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.609

Review 10.  Electronic approaches to restoration of sight.

Authors:  G A Goetz; D V Palanker
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2016-08-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.