Literature DB >> 27486110

Subretinal electrical stimulation reveals intact network activity in the blind mouse retina.

Henrike Stutzki1, Florian Helmhold2, Max Eickenscheidt2, Günther Zeck3.   

Abstract

Retinal degeneration (rd) leads to progressive photoreceptor cell death, resulting in vision loss. Stimulation of the inner-retinal neurons by neuroprosthetic implants is one of the clinically approved vision-restoration strategies, providing basic visual percepts to blind patients. However, little is understood as to what degree the degenerating retinal circuitry and the resulting aberrant hyperactivity may prevent the stimulation of physiological electrical activity. Therefore, we electrically stimulated ex vivo retinas from wild-type (wt; C57BL/6J) and blind (rd10 and rd1) mice using an implantable subretinal microchip and simultaneously recorded and analyzed the retinal ganglion cell (RGC) output with a flexible microelectrode array. We found that subretinal anodal stimulation of the rd10 retina and wt retina evoked similar spatiotemporal RGC-spiking patterns. In both retinas, electrically stimulated ON and a small percentage of OFF RGC responses were detected. The spatial selectivity of the retinal network to electrical stimuli reveals an intact underlying network with a median receptive-field center of 350 μm in both retinas. An antagonistic surround is activated by stimulation with large electrode fields. However, in rd10 and to a higher percentage, in rd1 retinas, rhythmic and spatially unconfined RGC patterns were evoked by anodal or by cathodal electrical stimuli. Our findings demonstrate that the surviving retinal circuitry in photoreceptor-degenerated retinas is preserved in a way allowing for the stimulation of temporally diverse and spatially confined RGC activity. Future vision restoration strategies can build on these results but need to avoid evoking the easily inducible rhythmic activity in some retinal circuits.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  neuroprosthetic stimulation; photoreceptor degeneration; retinal network

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27486110      PMCID: PMC5144714          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01095.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  54 in total

1.  The slow wave component of retinal activity in rd/rd mice recorded with a multi-electrode array.

Authors:  J H Ye; Y S Goo
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2007-09-05       Impact factor: 2.833

2.  Developmental time course distinguishes changes in spontaneous and light-evoked retinal ganglion cell activity in rd1 and rd10 mice.

Authors:  Steven F Stasheff; Malini Shankar; Michael P Andrews
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-03-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Retinal degeneration mutants in the mouse.

Authors:  B Chang; N L Hawes; R E Hurd; M T Davisson; S Nusinowitz; J R Heckenlively
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Network oscillations in rod-degenerated mouse retinas.

Authors:  Jacob Menzler; Günther Zeck
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Aberrant synaptic input to retinal ganglion cells varies with morphology in a mouse model of retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Christopher W Yee; Abduqodir H Toychiev; Elena Ivanova; Botir T Sagdullaev
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2014-08-18       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Block of gap junctions eliminates aberrant activity and restores light responses during retinal degeneration.

Authors:  Abduqodir H Toychiev; Elena Ivanova; Christopher W Yee; Botir T Sagdullaev
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Subretinal electronic chips allow blind patients to read letters and combine them to words.

Authors:  Eberhart Zrenner; Karl Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt; Heval Benav; Dorothea Besch; Anna Bruckmann; Veit-Peter Gabel; Florian Gekeler; Udo Greppmaier; Alex Harscher; Steffen Kibbel; Johannes Koch; Akos Kusnyerik; Tobias Peters; Katarina Stingl; Helmut Sachs; Alfred Stett; Peter Szurman; Barbara Wilhelm; Robert Wilke
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Restoring the ON Switch in Blind Retinas: Opto-mGluR6, a Next-Generation, Cell-Tailored Optogenetic Tool.

Authors:  Michiel van Wyk; Justyna Pielecka-Fortuna; Siegrid Löwel; Sonja Kleinlogel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2015-05-07       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  Rhythmic ganglion cell activity in bleached and blind adult mouse retinas.

Authors:  Jacob Menzler; Lakshmi Channappa; Guenther Zeck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Aberrant Activity in Degenerated Retinas Revealed by Electrical Imaging.

Authors:  Günther Zeck
Journal:  Front Cell Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 5.505

View more
  10 in total

1.  Spatiotemporal characteristics of retinal response to network-mediated photovoltaic stimulation.

Authors:  Elton Ho; Richard Smith; Georges Goetz; Xin Lei; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore I Kamins; James Harris; Keith Mathieson; Daniel Palanker; Alexander Sher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.

Authors:  Daniel Caravaca-Rodriguez; Susana P Gaytan; Gregg J Suaning; Alejandro Barriga-Rivera
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2022-10-03       Impact factor: 4.925

3.  Retinal Degeneration Reduces Consistency of Network-Mediated Responses Arising in Ganglion Cells to Electric Stimulation.

Authors:  Young Jun Yoon; Jae-Ik Lee; Ye Ji Jang; Seungki An; Jae Hun Kim; Shelley I Fried; Maesoon Im
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.802

4.  Electric stimulus duration alters network-mediated responses depending on retinal ganglion cell type.

Authors:  Maesoon Im; Paul Werginz; Shelley I Fried
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.379

5.  Neuromodulation using electroosmosis.

Authors:  Sai Siva Kare; Corey M Rountree; John B Troy; John D Finan; Laxman Saggere
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Honeycomb-shaped electro-neural interface enables cellular-scale pixels in subretinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Thomas Flores; Tiffany Huang; Mohajeet Bhuckory; Elton Ho; Zhijie Chen; Roopa Dalal; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Probing and predicting ganglion cell responses to smooth electrical stimulation in healthy and blind mouse retina.

Authors:  Larissa Höfling; Jonathan Oesterle; Philipp Berens; Günther Zeck
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-23       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Minimizing Iridium Oxide Electrodes for High Visual Acuity Subretinal Stimulation.

Authors:  Samir Damle; Maya Carleton; Theodoros Kapogianis; Shaurya Arya; Melina Cavichini-Corderio; William R Freeman; Yu-Hwa Lo; Nicholas W Oesch
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-12-23

9.  Electrical response of retinal ganglion cells in an N-methyl-N-nitrosourea-induced retinal degeneration porcine model.

Authors:  Seongkwang Cha; Kwang-Eon Choi; Jungryul Ahn; Minsu Yoo; Yurim Jeong; Seong-Woo Kim; Yong Sook Goo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Temporal structure in spiking patterns of ganglion cells defines perceptual thresholds in rodents with subretinal prosthesis.

Authors:  Elton Ho; Henri Lorach; Georges Goetz; Florian Laszlo; Xin Lei; Theodore Kamins; Jean-Charles Mariani; Alexander Sher; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.