Literature DB >> 16119365

Gender and speaker identification as a function of the number of channels in spectrally reduced speech.

Julio Gonzalez1, Juan C Oliver.   

Abstract

Considerable research on speech intelligibility for cochlear-implant users has been conducted using acoustic simulations with normal-hearing subjects. However, some relevant topics about perception through cochlear implants remain scantly explored. The present study examined the perception by normal-hearing subjects of gender and identity of a talker as a function of the number of channels in spectrally reduced speech. Two simulation strategies were compared. They were implemented by two different processors that presented signals as either the sum of sine waves at the center of the channels or as the sum of noise bands. In Experiment 1, 15 subjects determined the gender of 40 talkers (20 males + 20 females) from a natural utterance processed through 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 16 channels with both processors. In Experiment 2, 56 subjects matched a natural sentence uttered by 10 talkers with the corresponding simulation replicas processed through 3, 4, 8, and 16 channels for each processor. In Experiment 3, 72 subjects performed the same task but different sentences were used for natural and processed stimuli. A control Experiment 4 was conducted to equate the processing steps between the two simulation strategies. Results showed that gender and talker identification was better for the sine-wave processor, and that performance through the noise-band processor was more sensitive to the number of channels. Implications and possible explanations for the superiority of sine-wave simulations are discussed.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16119365     DOI: 10.1121/1.1928892

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  20 in total

1.  Talker-identification training using simulations of binaurally combined electric and acoustic hearing: generalization to speech and emotion recognition.

Authors:  Vidya Krull; Xin Luo; Karen Iler Kirk
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Shifting fundamental frequency in simulated electric-acoustic listening.

Authors:  Christopher A Brown; Nicole M Scherrer; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Evaluation and analysis of whispered speech for cochlear implant users: Gender identification and intelligibility.

Authors:  Oldooz Hazrati; Hussnain Ali; John H L Hansen; Emily Tobey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Perceptual learning of spectrally degraded speech and environmental sounds.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Vocal emotion recognition by normal-hearing listeners and cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Qian-Jie Fu; John J Galvin
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2007-12

6.  Multiple routes to the perceptual learning of speech.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; Tessa Bent; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Differential contribution of envelope fluctuations across frequency to consonant identification in quiet.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Sid P Bacon
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Effects of envelope bandwidth on the intelligibility of sine- and noise-vocoded speech.

Authors:  Pamela Souza; Stuart Rosen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Perceptual adaptation and intelligibility of multiple talkers for two types of degraded speech.

Authors:  Tessa Bent; Adam Buchwald; David B Pisoni
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Transfer of auditory perceptual learning with spectrally reduced speech to speech and nonspeech tasks: implications for cochlear implants.

Authors:  Jeremy L Loebach; David B Pisoni; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.570

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.