Literature DB >> 17998986

Evaluating the accuracy of pharmacy students' self-assessment skills.

Zubin Austin1, Paul A M Gregory.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of self-assessment skills of senior-level bachelor of science pharmacy students.
METHODS: A method proposed by Kruger and Dunning involving comparisons of pharmacy students' self-assessment with weighted average assessments of peers, standardized patients, and pharmacist-instructors was used.
RESULTS: Eighty students participated in the study. Differences between self-assessment and external assessments were found across all performance quartiles. These differences were particularly large and significant in the third and fourth (lowest) quartiles and particularly marked in the areas of empathy, and logic/focus/coherence of interviewing.
CONCLUSIONS: The quality and accuracy of pharmacy students' self-assessment skills were not as strong as expected, particularly given recent efforts to include self-assessment in the curriculum. Further work is necessary to ensure this important practice competency and life skill is at the level expected for professional practice and continuous professional development.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assessment; continuous professional development; evaluation; pharmacy student; self-assessment

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17998986      PMCID: PMC2064887          DOI: 10.5688/aj710589

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  14 in total

1.  Lake Wobegon be gone! The "below-average effect" and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments.

Authors:  J Kruger
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-08

2.  Self-assessment in pharmacy education.

Authors:  Nancy Fjortoft
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Self-assessment in lifelong learning and improving performance in practice: physician know thyself.

Authors:  F Daniel Duffy; Eric S Holmboe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The Surgical Learning and Instructional Portfolio (SLIP) as a self-assessment educational tool demonstrating practice-based learning.

Authors:  Travis P Webb; Charles Aprahamian; John A Weigelt; Karen J Brasel
Journal:  Curr Surg       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec

5.  Assessing clinical performance with standardized patients.

Authors:  J A Colliver; M H Swartz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997-09-03       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Overconfident prediction of future actions and outcomes by self and others.

Authors:  R P Vallone; D W Griffin; S Lin; L Ross
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1990-04

7.  Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments.

Authors:  J Kruger; D Dunning
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1999-12

8.  Knowing that you don't know: metamemory and discourse processing.

Authors:  C M Klin; A E Guzmán; W H Levine
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 9.  Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: a systematic review.

Authors:  David A Davis; Paul E Mazmanian; Michael Fordis; R Van Harrison; Kevin E Thorpe; Laure Perrier
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Cognitive optimism: self-deception or memory-based processing heuristics?

Authors:  J Metcalfe
Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev       Date:  1998
View more
  30 in total

1.  Peer- and self-grading compared to faculty grading.

Authors:  Mary L Wagner; Dong Churl Suh; Sandy Cruz
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Student evaluations of the portfolio process.

Authors:  John E Murphy; Tatum C Airey; Andrea M Bisso; Marion K Slack
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  First-year pharmacy students' self-assessment of communication skills and the impact of video review.

Authors:  Jane R Mort; Daniel J Hansen
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Anonymous peer assessment of medication management reviews.

Authors:  Iman A Basheti; Greg Ryan; Jim Woulfe; Kathryn Bartimote-Aufflick
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 5.  Self-assessment in pharmacy and health science education and professional practice.

Authors:  Carol A Motycka; Renee L Rose; L Douglas Ried; Gayle Brazeau
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Fostering Interdisciplinary Communication between Pharmacy and Nursing Students.

Authors:  Aleda M H Chen; Mary E Kiersma; Carrie N Keib; Stephanie Cailor
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Finding and using readily available sources of assessment data.

Authors:  Eric G Boyce
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

8.  Comparison of pharmacy students' perceived and actual knowledge using the Pharmacy Curricular Outcomes Assessment.

Authors:  Cynthia A Naughton; Daniel L Friesner
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2012-05-10       Impact factor: 2.047

9.  A comparison of students' self-assessments with faculty evaluations of their communication skills.

Authors:  Lisa M Lundquist; Angela O Shogbon; Kathryn M Momary; Hannah K Rogers
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  A mentor-based portfolio program to evaluate pharmacy students' self-assessment skills.

Authors:  Lindsay R Kalata; Marie A Abate
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2013-05-13       Impact factor: 2.047

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.