Literature DB >> 23716740

A comparison of students' self-assessments with faculty evaluations of their communication skills.

Lisa M Lundquist1, Angela O Shogbon, Kathryn M Momary, Hannah K Rogers.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare students' self-assessment of their communication skills with faculty members' formal evaluation of their skills in a therapeutics course.
METHODS: Over a 3-year period, faculty members evaluated second-year pharmacy students' communication skills as part of a requirement in a therapeutics course. Immediately following an individual oral assessment and again following a group oral assessment, students self-assessed their communication skills using the same rubric the faculty members had used. Students' self-assessments were then compared with faculty members' evaluation of students' communication skills.
RESULTS: Four hundred one (97.3%) students consented to participate in this study. Faculty evaluation scores of students for both the individual and group oral assessments were significantly higher than students' self-assessment scores. Students' self-assessment scores of their communication skills increased from the individual to the group oral assessment.
CONCLUSION: Students' self-assessments of communication skills were consistently lower than faculty members' evaluations. Greater use of oral assessments throughout the pharmacy curriculum may help to improve students' confidence in and self-assessment of their communication skills.

Keywords:  communication skills; oral assessment; pharmacy students; self-assessment; therapeutics

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23716740      PMCID: PMC3663626          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe77472

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  13 in total

1.  Students' and assessors' attitudes towards students' self-assessment of their personal and professional behaviours.

Authors:  Charlotte Rees; Maggie Shepherd
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.251

2.  Can family medicine residents predict their performance on the in-training examination?

Authors:  Robert W Parker; Cindy Alford; Cindy Passmore
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

3.  Self-assessment in pharmacy education.

Authors:  Nancy Fjortoft
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Evaluating the accuracy of pharmacy students' self-assessment skills.

Authors:  Zubin Austin; Paul A M Gregory
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  A tool to teach communication skills to pharmacy students.

Authors:  Sanah Hasan
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2008-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Improvisational exercises to improve pharmacy students' professional communication skills.

Authors:  Kevin P Boesen; Richard N Herrier; David A Apgar; Rebekah M Jackowski
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 2.047

7.  Medical students' self-assessment accuracy in communication skills.

Authors:  L D Gruppen; J Garcia; C M Grum; J T Fitzgerald; C A White; L Dicken; J C Sisson; A Zweifler
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.893

8.  Medical students' clinical self-assessments: comparisons with external measures of performance and the students' self-assessments of overall performance and effort.

Authors:  J O Woolliscroft; J TenHaken; J Smith; J G Calhoun
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 6.893

9.  Communicating with patients: skills assessment in US colleges of pharmacy.

Authors:  Carole L Kimberlin
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

10.  The impact of a standardized patient program on student learning of communication skills.

Authors:  Nathaniel M Rickles; Phuong Tieu; Lindsay Myers; Suzanne Galal; Valerie Chung
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 2.047

View more
  8 in total

1.  Using the Jigsaw Technique to Teach Clinical Controversy in a Clinical Skills Course.

Authors:  Jennifer Phillips; Julie Fusco
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 2.  The Social Psychology of Biased Self-Assessment.

Authors:  Samuel C Karpen
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Assessing Interprofessional Education Collaborative Competencies in Service-Learning Course.

Authors:  Alexa M Sevin; Kenneth M Hale; Nicole V Brown; James W McAuley
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Inter-Rater Reliability of Web-Based Calibrated Peer Review within a Pharmacy Curriculum.

Authors:  Alex N Isaacs; Monica L Miller; Tianyang Hu; Bailey Johnson; Zach A Weber
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  Objectivity in subjectivity: do students' self and peer assessments correlate with examiners' subjective and objective assessment in clinical skills? A prospective study.

Authors:  A'man Talal Inayah; Lucman A Anwer; Mohammad Abrar Shareef; Akram Nurhussen; Haifa Mazen Alkabbani; Alhanouf A Alzahrani; Adam Subait Obad; Muhammad Zafar; Nasir Ali Afsar
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Grit in Medical Education: Differing Perspectives of Residents and Mentors.

Authors:  Michael J Asken; Siddharth Goel; Isha Shrimanker; Michelle-Ashley Rizk; Nicholas Abourizk; Vinod Nookala
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-05-27

7.  Comparison of clinical competency self-assessments among Advanced Education in General Dentistry (AEGD) residents before and during COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Anna D'Emilio; Shabnam Seyedzadeh Sabounchi; Yinxiang Wu; Amy Kim; Etienne Franck; Daniel Kane; Martin Lieberman
Journal:  J Dent Educ       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 2.313

8.  Communication skills of medical students: survey of self- and external perception in a longitudinally based trend study.

Authors:  Joachim Graf; Teresa Loda; Stephan Zipfel; Annette Wosnik; Daniela Mohr; Anne Herrmann-Werner
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 2.463

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.