Literature DB >> 15647138

Cognitive optimism: self-deception or memory-based processing heuristics?

J Metcalfe1.   

Abstract

In a wide variety of cognitive tasks, people's expectations of what their own performance is, was, and will be are an overestimate of reality. After documenting a number of situations in which people exhibit such overconfidence, several reasons for it are discussed. It is suggested that in these situations, the optimistic bias is not attributable exclusively to self-deception or wishful thinking. Rather, the information yielded up by the cognitive system, in combination with the heuristics used for making judgments of future and past performance tailored to the specific questions asked of participants, produces a bias toward believing that one knows, knew, and will perform better than actual performance substantiates. Consequently, in the cognitive domain, the inflated beliefs that result in overconfidence also result in cessation of efforts before the correct solution of problems is ascertained, before accurate retrieval of memorial information is attained, or before adequate learning of new material has been accomplished. This effect seems in contrast to findings on people's moods and self-esteem in real-world or threatening situations that suggest that an optimistic bias in these domains be person protective and adaptive.

Entities:  

Year:  1998        PMID: 15647138     DOI: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0202_3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pers Soc Psychol Rev        ISSN: 1532-7957


  18 in total

1.  Unskilled but subjectively aware: Metacognitive monitoring ability and respective awareness in low-performing students.

Authors:  Marion Händel; Eva S Fritzsche
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2016-02

2.  Illusions of competence during study can be remedied by manipulations that enhance learners' sensitivity to retrieval conditions at test.

Authors:  Asher Koriat; Robert A Bjork
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-07

3.  Evaluating the accuracy of pharmacy students' self-assessment skills.

Authors:  Zubin Austin; Paul A M Gregory
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  Judgments of learning: evidence for a two-stage process.

Authors:  Lisa K Son; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-09

5.  Principles of cognitive science in education: the effects of generation, errors, and feedback.

Authors:  Janet Metcalfe; Nate Kornell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2007-04

6.  Judgments of Learning are Influenced by Memory for Past Test.

Authors:  Bridgid Finn; Janet Metcalfe
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  A cognitive-science based programme to enhance study efficacy in a high and low risk setting.

Authors:  Janet Metcalfe; Nate Kornell; Lisa K Son
Journal:  Eur J Cogn Psychol       Date:  2007

8.  Delusions of expertise: the high standard of proof needed to demonstrate skills at horserace handicapping.

Authors:  Matthew Browne; Matthew J Rockloff; Alex Blaszcynski; Clive Allcock; Allen Windross
Journal:  J Gambl Stud       Date:  2015-03

9.  Memory for memory.

Authors:  S Joslyn; E Loftus; A McNoughton; J Powers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-09

10.  Age differences in the effects of conceptual integration training on resource allocation in sentence processing.

Authors:  Elizabeth A L Stine-Morrow; Soo Rim Noh; Matthew C Shake
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2009-11-25       Impact factor: 2.143

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.