Literature DB >> 21969718

Student evaluations of the portfolio process.

John E Murphy1, Tatum C Airey, Andrea M Bisso, Marion K Slack.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pharmacy students' perceived benefits of the portfolio process and to gather suggestions for improving the process.
METHODS: A questionnaire was designed and administered to 250 first-, second-, and third-year pharmacy students at the University of Arizona College of Pharmacy.
RESULTS: Although the objectives of the portfolio process were for students to understand the expected outcomes, understand the impact of extracurricular activities on attaining competencies, identify what should be learned, identify their strengths and weaknesses, and modify their approach to learning, overall students perceived the portfolio process as having less than moderate benefit. First-year students wanted more examples of portfolios while second- and third-year students suggested that more time with their advisor would be beneficial.
CONCLUSIONS: The portfolio process will continue to be refined and efforts made to improve students' perceptions of the process as it is intended to develop the self-assessments skills they will need to improve their knowledge and professional skills throughout their pharmacy careers.

Keywords:  assessment; expected outcomes; portfolio; questionnaire; survey

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21969718      PMCID: PMC3175659          DOI: 10.5688/ajpe757132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ        ISSN: 0002-9459            Impact factor:   2.047


  8 in total

1.  Electronic reflective student portfolios to demonstrate achievement of ability-based outcomes during advanced pharmacy practice experiences.

Authors:  Laurie L Briceland; Robert A Hamilton
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Self-assessment in pharmacy education.

Authors:  Nancy Fjortoft
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2006-06-15       Impact factor: 2.047

3.  Evaluating the accuracy of pharmacy students' self-assessment skills.

Authors:  Zubin Austin; Paul A M Gregory
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-10-15       Impact factor: 2.047

4.  The portfolio approach to competency-based assessment at the Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine.

Authors:  Elaine F Dannefer; Lindsey C Henson
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.893

Review 5.  Use of reflective portfolios in health sciences education.

Authors:  Cecilia M Plaza; Jolaine Reierson Draugalis; Marion K Slack; Grant H Skrepnek; Karen Ann Sauer
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

6.  Using an online portfolio in postgraduate training.

Authors:  Niels Kristian Kjaer; Roar Maagaard; Sidsel Wied
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 3.650

Review 7.  The effectiveness of portfolios for post-graduate assessment and education: BEME Guide No 12.

Authors:  Claire Tochel; Alex Haig; Anne Hesketh; Ann Cadzow; Karen Beggs; Iain Colthart; Heather Peacock
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.650

8.  Personal professional profiles.

Authors:  A Richardson
Journal:  Nurs Stand       Date:  1998 Jun 10-16
  8 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  The Use of Portfolios in US Pharmacy Schools.

Authors:  Kimberly K Daugherty; Denise M Cumberland
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.047

2.  Using Continuing Professional Development with Portfolio in a Pharmaceutics Course.

Authors:  Jennifer Schneider; Kate O'Hara; Irene Munro
Journal:  Pharmacy (Basel)       Date:  2016-11-07
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.