Literature DB >> 17879798

Characterization of noise sources for two generations of computed radiography systems using powder and crystalline photostimulable phosphors.

Alistair Mackenzie1, Ian D Honey.   

Abstract

The performances of two generations of computed radiography (CR) were tested and compared in terms of resolution and noise characteristics. The main aim was to characterize and quantify the noise sources in the images. The systems tested were (1) Agfa CR 25.0, a flying spot reader with powder phosphor image plates (MD 40.0); and (2) the Agfa DX-S, a line-scanning CR reader with needle crystal phosphor image plates (HD 5.0). For both systems, the standard metrics of presampled modulation transfer function (MTF), normalized noise power spectra (NNPS) and detective quantum efficiency (DQE) were measured using standard radiation quality RQA5 as defined by the International Electrotechnical Commission. The various noise sources contributing to the NNPS were separated by using knowledge of their relationship with air kerma, MTF, absorption efficiency and antialiasing filters. The DX-S MTF was superior compared with the CR 25.0. The maximum difference in MTF between the DX-S scan and CR 25.0 subscan directions was 0.13 at 1.3 mm(-1). For a nominal detector air kerma of 4 microGy, the peak DQE of the DX-S was 43 (+/-3)%, which was over double that of the CR 25.0 of 18 (+/-2)%. The additive electronic noise was negligible on the CR 25.0 but calculated to be constant 3.4 x 10(-7) (+/-0.4 x 10(-7)) mm2 at 3.9 microGy on the DX-S. The DX-S has improved image quality compared with a traditional flying spot reader. The separation of the noise sources indicates that the improvements in DQE of the DX-S are due not only to the higher quantum, efficiency and MTF, but also the lower structure, secondary quantum, and excess noise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17879798     DOI: 10.1118/1.2750973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  10 in total

1.  A method for the determination of the two-dimensional MTF of digital radiography systems using only the noise response.

Authors:  Andrew Kuhls-Gilcrist; Daniel R Bednarek; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2010-03-23

2.  Artifacts found during quality assurance testing of computed radiography and digital radiography detectors.

Authors:  Ian D Honey; Alistair Mackenzie
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-04-22       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Accurate MTF measurement in digital radiography using noise response.

Authors:  Andrew Kuhls-Gilcrist; Amit Jain; Daniel R Bednarek; Kenneth R Hoffmann; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Measuring the presampled MTF from a reduced number of flat-field images using the Noise Response (NR) method.

Authors:  Andrew Kuhls-Gilcrist; Amit Jain; Daniel R Bednarek; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2011-03-01

5.  The role of activator concentration and precipitate formation on optical and dosimetric properties of KCl:Eu(2+) storage phosphor detectors.

Authors:  Rachael A Hansel; Zhiyan Xiao; Yanle Hu; Olga Green; Deshan Yang; H Harold Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Modeling the performance characteristics of computed radiography (CR) systems.

Authors:  Srinivasan Vedantham; Andrew Karellas
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 10.048

7.  Component analysis of a new Solid State X-ray Image Intensifier (SSXII) using photon transfer and Instrumentation Noise Equivalent Exposure (INEE) measurements.

Authors:  Andrew Kuhls-Gilcrist; Daniel R Bednarek; Stephen Rudin
Journal:  Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng       Date:  2009-01-01

8.  Detector or system? Extending the concept of detective quantum efficiency to characterize the performance of digital radiographic imaging systems.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Nicole T Ranger; Alistair MacKenzie; Ian D Honey; James T Dobbins; Carl E Ravin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Development of a storage phosphor imaging system for proton pencil beam spot profile determination.

Authors:  Jufri Setianegara; Thomas R Mazur; Yao Hao; Deshan Yang; H Harold Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-08-10       Impact factor: 4.506

Review 10.  Storage Phosphors for Medical Imaging.

Authors:  Paul Leblans; Dirk Vandenbroucke; Peter Willems
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2011-06-09       Impact factor: 3.623

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.