Literature DB >> 18427900

Artifacts found during quality assurance testing of computed radiography and digital radiography detectors.

Ian D Honey1, Alistair Mackenzie.   

Abstract

A series of artifact images, obtained over 5 years of performance testing, of both computed radiography (CR) and integrated digital radiographic X-ray imaging detectors are presented. The images presented are all either flat field or test object images and show artifacts previously either undescribed in the existing literature or meriting further comment. The artifacts described are caused by incorrect flat field corrections, a failing amplifier, damaged detector lines affecting their neighbors, lost information between neighboring detector tiles, image retention, delamination of a detector, poor setup of mechanical movements in CR, suckers damaging a CR plate, inappropriate use of grid suppression software, inappropriate use of a low pass spatial frequency filter, and unsharp masking filters. The causes and significance of the artifacts are explained and categorized as software or hardware related. Actions taken to correct the artifacts are described and explained. This work will help physicists, radiographers, and radiologists identify various image quality problems and shows that quality assurance is useful in identifying artifacts.

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18427900      PMCID: PMC3043706          DOI: 10.1007/s10278-008-9109-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  11 in total

1.  A ghost story: spatio-temporal response characteristics of an indirect-detection flat-panel imager.

Authors:  J H Siewerdsen; D A Jaffray
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Artefacts found in computed radiography.

Authors:  L J Cesar; B A Schueler; F E Zink; T R Daly; J P Taubel; L L Jorgenson
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  An experimental comparison of detector performance for direct and indirect digital radiography systems.

Authors:  Ehsan Samei; Michael J Flynn
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Aliasing effects in digital images of line-pair phantoms.

Authors:  Michael Albert; Daniel J Beideck; Predrag R Bakic; Andrew D A Maidment
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Assessment of the effects of pixel loss on image quality in direct digital radiography.

Authors:  R Padgett; C J Kotre
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-03-21       Impact factor: 3.609

6.  Artifacts in computed radiography.

Authors:  S L Solomon; R G Jost; H S Glazer; S S Sagel; D J Anderson; P L Molina
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Recognition and prevention of computed radiography image artifacts.

Authors:  Kevin Hammerstrom; John Aldrich; Len Alves; Andrew Ho
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Characterization of noise sources for two generations of computed radiography systems using powder and crystalline photostimulable phosphors.

Authors:  Alistair Mackenzie; Ian D Honey
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.071

9.  Artifacts in chest radiographs with a third-generation computed radiography system.

Authors:  J P Volpe; M L Storto; K P Andriole; G Gamsu
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Physical imaging performance of a compact computed radiography acquisition device.

Authors:  S M Kengyelics; J H Launders; A R Cowen
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  1 in total

1.  A randomized controlled trial comparing tibial migration of the ATTUNE cemented cruciate-retaining knee prosthesis with the PFC-sigma design.

Authors:  Bart L Kaptein; Peter den Hollander; Bregje Thomassen; Martha Fiocco; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Bone Joint J       Date:  2020-09       Impact factor: 5.082

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.