Literature DB >> 11954948

Early and late clinical outcomes following coronary perforation in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

Tatsuya Fukutomi1, Takahiko Suzuki, Jeffrey J Popma, Hiroaki Hosokawa, Kouichi Yokoya, Tsuyoshi Inada, Motoya Hayase, Hiroaki Kondo, Shigenori Ito, Shogo Suzuki, Makoto Itoh.   

Abstract

Coronary perforation is a rare but serious complication that occurs during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This study examines the frequency of coronary perforation during PCI, evaluates the management strategies used to treat perforations, and describes the long-term prognosis of patients who have developed coronary perforation during PCI. Coronary perforations were found in 69 (0.93%) of 7,443 consecutive PCI procedures, occurring more often after use of a new device (0.86%) than after use of balloon angioplasty (0.41%) (p<0.05). Coronary perforation was attributable solely to the coronary guidewire in 27 (0.36%) cases. Coronary perforations were divided into 2 types: (1) Those with epicardial staining without ajet of contrast extravasation (type I, n=51), and (2) those with a jet of contrast extravasation (type II, n= 18). Patients with type I and type II perforations were managed by observation only (35% and 0%, respectively), reversal of anticoagulation (57% and 94%), pericardiocentesis and drainage (27% and 61%), and prolonged perfusion balloon angioplasty (16% and 100%). Two patients with type II perforations required emergency coronary artery bypass surgery. There were no in-hospital deaths. Late pseudoaneurysms developed in 18 (28.6%) patients during the 13.4 +/- 11.3 months' follow-up period, and were more common in patients with type II perforations (72.2% vs 11.1% with type I perforations; p<0.001). During the follow-up period, no patient had evidence of coronary rupture. The results suggest that coronary perforation is uncommon after PCI, and can be managed without cardiac surgery in the majority of cases. Late pseudoaneurysms developed in some patients, particularly in patients with type II perforations, but there were no late consequences of coronary perforation after PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11954948     DOI: 10.1253/circj.66.349

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circ J        ISSN: 1346-9843            Impact factor:   2.993


  12 in total

1.  Magnetically-assisted remote control (MARC) steering of endovascular catheters for interventional MRI: a model for deflection and design implications.

Authors:  Fabio Settecase; Marshall S Sussman; Mark W Wilson; Steven Hetts; Ronald L Arenson; Vincent Malba; Anthony F Bernhardt; Walter Kucharczyk; Timothy P L Roberts
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Coronary Artery Perforation following PCI: An Interesting Finding into the Pericardial Space.

Authors:  Georgios Dimitrakakis; Ulrich Otto Von Oppell; Subramaniam Balachandran; Agamemnon Pericleous; Richard Anderson
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2013-12

3.  Intravascular ultrasound evidence of perivascular trauma during routine percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Akiko Maehara; Gary S Mintz; Anh B Bui; Augusto D Pichard; Lowell F Satler; Ron Waksman; William O Suddath; Kenneth M Kent; Neil J Weissman
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.357

4.  Successful surgical management of coronary perforation requiring pulmonary artery separation.

Authors:  Noriyuki Takashima; Tomoaki Suzuki; Soh Hosoba; Takeshi Kinoshita; Hiromitsu Nota; Keiji Matsubayashi; Tohru Asai
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-05-23

5.  Acute and long-term outcome after coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary interventions.

Authors:  H Eggebrecht; A Ritzel; C von Birgelen; A Schermund; C Naber; D Böse; D Baumgart; T Bartel; M Haude; R Erbel
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2004-10

Review 6.  Treatment of right ventricular perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Guoqiang Gu; Jidong Zhang; Wei Cui
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2015-05-23       Impact factor: 1.167

7.  Is a metallic microcoil really a permanent embolic agent for the management of distal guidewire-induced coronary artery perforation?

Authors:  Jae Hyun Kim; Min-Kyu Kim; Young Jin Kim; Sun Man Park; Kyoung-Ha Park; Young-Jin Choi
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 3.243

8.  Coronary perforation and covered stents: an update and review.

Authors:  Mohammed Al-Mukhaini; Prashanth Panduranga; Kadhim Sulaiman; Abdulla Amour Riyami; Mohammed Deeb; Mohamed Barkat Riyami
Journal:  Heart Views       Date:  2011-04

9.  Fatal delayed coronary artery perforation after coronary stent implantation.

Authors:  Sang-Hoon Kim; Jae-Youn Moon; Jung-Hoon Sung; In Jai Kim; Sang-Wook Lim; Dong-Hun Cha; Seung-Yun Cho
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.243

10.  Coronary Perforation Complicating Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - A Case Illustration and Review.

Authors:  Ang Chin Yong; Jack Tan Wei Chieh
Journal:  ASEAN Heart J       Date:  2013
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.