Literature DB >> 15289374

Myocardial first-pass perfusion magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter dose-ranging study.

S D Wolff1, J Schwitter, R Coulden, M G Friedrich, D A Bluemke, R W Biederman, E T Martin, A J Lansky, F Kashanian, T K F Foo, P E Licato, C R Comeau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: MRI can identify patients with obstructive coronary artery disease by imaging the left ventricular myocardium during a first-pass contrast bolus in the presence and absence of pharmacologically induced myocardial hyperemia. The purpose of this multicenter dose-ranging study was to determine the minimally efficacious dose of gadopentetate dimeglumine injection (Magnevist Injection; Berlex Laboratories) for detecting obstructive coronary artery disease. METHOD AND
RESULTS: A total of 99 patients scheduled for coronary artery catheterization as part of their clinical evaluation were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomized to 1 of 3 doses of gadopentate dimeglumine: 0.05, 0.10, or 0.15 mmol/kg. First-pass perfusion imaging was performed during hyperemia (induced by a 4-minute infusion of adenosine at a rate of 140 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1)) and then again in the absence of adenosine with otherwise identical imaging parameters and the same contrast dose. Perfusion defects were evaluated subjectively by 4 blinded reviewers. Receiver-operating curve analysis showed that the areas under the receiver-operating curve were 0.90, 0.72, and 0.83 for the low-, medium-, and high-contrast doses, respectively, compared with quantitative coronary angiography (diameter stenosis > or =70%). For the low-dose group, mean sensitivity was 93+/-0%, mean specificity was 75+/-7%, and mean accuracy was 85+/-3%.
CONCLUSIONS: First-pass perfusion MRI is a safe and accurate test for identifying patients with obstructive coronary artery disease. A low dose of 0.05 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine is at least as efficacious as higher doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15289374     DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138106.84335.62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  54 in total

1.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 2.  ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents.

Authors:  W Gregory Hundley; David A Bluemke; J Paul Finn; Scott D Flamm; Mark A Fogel; Matthias G Friedrich; Vincent B Ho; Michael Jerosch-Herold; Christopher M Kramer; Warren J Manning; Manesh Patel; Gerald M Pohost; Arthur E Stillman; Richard D White; Pamela K Woodard
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 3.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance: structure, function, perfusion, and viability.

Authors:  David C Isbell; Christopher M Kramer
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of non-invasive imaging in known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J D Schuijf; D Poldermans; L J Shaw; J W Jukema; H J Lamb; A de Roos; W Wijns; E E van der Wall; J J Bax
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  [Cardiovascular MRT--replacement of diagnostic invasive coronary angiography?].

Authors:  S Kelle; E Nagel; E Fleck
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 6.  Cardiac imaging in coronary artery disease: differing modalities.

Authors:  J D Schuijf; L J Shaw; W Wijns; H J Lamb; D Poldermans; A de Roos; E E van der Wall; J J Bax
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Magnetic resonance approaches and recent advances in myocardial perfusion imaging.

Authors:  Daniel C Lee; Francis J Klocke
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Myocardial perfusion by first pass contrast magnetic resonance: a robust method for quantitative regional assessment of perfusion reserve index.

Authors:  V Positano; A Pingitore; B Scattini; M F Santarelli; D De Marchi; B Favilli; M Lombardi; L Landini
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 9.  Magnetic resonance cardiac perfusion imaging-a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Peter Hunold; Thomas Schlosser; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  32-element receiver-coil array for cardiac imaging.

Authors:  Christopher J Hardy; Harvey E Cline; Randy O Giaquinto; Thoralf Niendorf; Aaron K Grant; Daniel K Sodickson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.668

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.