Literature DB >> 14648105

Steady-state free precession sequences in myocardial first-pass perfusion MR imaging: comparison with TurboFLASH imaging.

Peter Hunold1, Stefan Maderwald, Holger Eggebrecht, Florian M Vogt, Jörg Barkhausen.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the image quality of a saturation-recovery gradient-recalled echo (GRE; TurboFLASH) and a saturation-recovery SSFP (SR-TrueFISP) sequence for myocardial first-pass perfusion MRI. Eight patients with chronic myocardial infarction and 8 volunteers were examined with a TurboFLASH (TR 2.1 ms, TE 1 ms, FA 8 degrees ) and a SR-TrueFISP sequence (TR 2.1 ms, TE 0.9 ms, FA, 50 degrees ) on a 1.5 T scanner. During injection of 0.05 mmol/kg BW Gd-DTPA at 4 ml/s, three short axis slices (8 mm) of the left ventricle (LV) were simultaneously scanned during breath-hold. Maximum signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) between infarcted and normal myocardium, and percentage signal intensity change (PSIC) were measured within the LV lumen and in four regions of the LV myocardium for the three slices separately. For the LV lumen, SR-TrueFISP was superior in SNR and PSIC (factor 3.2 and 1.6, respectively). Mean maximum SNR, PSIC, and CNR during peak enhancement in the LV myocardium were higher for SR-TrueFISP compared with TurboFLASH (factor 2.4, 1.25, and 1.24, respectively). The SNR was higher in the septal portion of the ventricle than in anterior/posterior and lateral regions. The SR-TrueFISP provides higher SNR and improves image quality compared with TurboFLASH in first-pass myocardial perfusion MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14648105     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-003-2176-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  27 in total

1.  MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study.

Authors:  J Barkhausen; S G Ruehm; M Goyen; T Buck; G Laub; J F Debatin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Quantitative magnetic resonance first-pass perfusion analysis: inter- and intraobserver agreement.

Authors:  O M Mühling; M E Dickson; A Zenovich; Y Huang; B V Wilson; R F Wilson; I S Anand; R T Seethamraju; M Jerosch-Herold; N M Wilke
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.364

3.  [Evaluation of myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with CAD using contrast-enhanced MRI: a comparison between semiquantitative and quantitative methods].

Authors:  M Schmitt; O K Mohrs; S E Petersen; K F Kreitner; T Voigtländer; T Wittlinger; G Horstick; S Ziegler; J Meyer; M Thelen; W G Schreiber
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  2002-02

4.  Echo-planar magnetic resonance myocardial perfusion imaging: parametric map analysis and comparison with thallium SPECT.

Authors:  J R Panting; P D Gatehouse; G Z Yang; M Jerosch-Herold; N Wilke; D N Firmin; D J Pennell
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Fast phase-contrast velocity measurement in the steady state.

Authors:  William R Overall; Dwight G Nishimura; Bob S Hu
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  Assessment of coronary artery disease severity by positron emission tomography. Comparison with quantitative arteriography in 193 patients.

Authors:  L L Demer; K L Gould; R A Goldstein; R L Kirkeeide; N A Mullani; R W Smalling; A Nishikawa; M E Merhige
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography.

Authors:  J Schwitter; D Nanz; S Kneifel; K Bertschinger; M Büchi; P R Knüsel; B Marincek; T F Lüscher; G K von Schulthess
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-05-08       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Magnetic resonance imaging of regional myocardial perfusion in patients with single-vessel coronary artery disease: quantitative comparison with (201)Thallium-SPECT and coronary angiography.

Authors:  J T Keijer; A C van Rossum; M J van Eenige; J J Bax; F C Visser; J J Teule; C A Visser
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 9.  Myocardial perfusion imaging with PET.

Authors:  M Schwaiger
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Chronic Stable Angina).

Authors:  Raymond J Gibbons; Jonathan Abrams; Kanu Chatterjee; Jennifer Daley; Prakash C Deedwania; John S Douglas; T Bruce Ferguson; Stephan D Fihn; Theodore D Fraker; Julius M Gardin; Robert A O'Rourke; Richard C Pasternak; Sankey V Williams; Raymond J Gibbons; Joseph S Alpert; Elliott M Antman; Loren F Hiratzka; Valentin Fuster; David P Faxon; Gabriel Gregoratos; Alice K Jacobs; Sidney C Smith
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-01-07       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and the evaluation of heart failure.

Authors:  James C C Moon; Sanjay K Prasad
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Myocardial viability assessment in patients with highly impaired left ventricular function: comparison of delayed enhancement, dobutamine stress MRI, end-diastolic wall thickness, and TI201-SPECT with functional recovery after revascularization.

Authors:  M Gutberlet; M Fröhlich; S Mehl; H Amthauer; H Hausmann; R Meyer; H Siniawski; J Ruf; M Plotkin; T Denecke; B Schnackenburg; R Hetzer; R Felix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2005-03-08       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance cardiac perfusion imaging-a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Peter Hunold; Thomas Schlosser; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-03       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 4.  Characterization of myocardial viability using MR and CT imaging.

Authors:  Gabriele A Krombach; Thoralf Niendorf; Rolf W Günther; Andreas H Mahnken
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  High-resolution myocardial perfusion imaging at 3 T: comparison to 1.5 T in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  K Strach; C Meyer; D Thomas; C P Naehle; C Schmitz; H Litt; A Bernstein; B Cheng; H Schild; T Sommer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  High-resolution myocardial stress perfusion at 3 T in patients with suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Carsten Meyer; Katharina Strach; Daniel Thomas; Harold Litt; Claas P Nähle; Klaus Tiemann; Ulrich Schwenger; Hans H Schild; Torsten Sommer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-09-13       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  High resolution myocardial magnetic resonance stress perfusion imaging at 3 T using a 1 M contrast agent.

Authors:  Bernhard D Klumpp; Achim Seeger; Christina Doesch; Joerg Doering; Tobias Hoevelborn; Ulrich Kramer; Michael Fenchel; Meinrad P Gawaz; Claus D Claussen; Stephan Miller
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Towards real-time cardiovascular magnetic resonance-guided transarterial aortic valve implantation: in vitro evaluation and modification of existing devices.

Authors:  Philipp Kahlert; Holger Eggebrecht; Björn Plicht; Oliver Kraff; Ian McDougall; Brad Decker; Raimund Erbel; Mark E Ladd; Harald H Quick
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 9.  Quantification of myocardial perfusion by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Michael Jerosch-Herold
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 5.364

10.  Dynamic MRI of the vocal cords using phased-array coils: A feasibility study.

Authors:  Marc Schlamann; Gotz Lehnerdt; Stefan Maderwald; Susanne Ladd
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2009 Apr-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.