Literature DB >> 11342469

Assessment of myocardial perfusion in coronary artery disease by magnetic resonance: a comparison with positron emission tomography and coronary angiography.

J Schwitter1, D Nanz, S Kneifel, K Bertschinger, M Büchi, P R Knüsel, B Marincek, T F Lüscher, G K von Schulthess.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Monitoring contrast medium wash-in kinetics in hyperemic myocardium by magnetic resonance (MR) allows for the detection of stenosed coronary arteries. In this prospective study, the quality of a multislice MR approach with respect to the detection and sizing of compromised myocardium was determined and compared with positron emission tomography (PET) and quantitative coronary angiography. METHODS AND
RESULTS: A total of 48 patients and healthy subjects were studied by MR using a multislice hybrid echo-planar pulse sequence for monitoring the myocardial first pass kinetics of gadolinium-diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid bismethylamide (Omniscan; 0.1 mmol/kg injected at 3 mL/s IV) during hyperemia (dipyridamole 0.56 mg/kg). Signal intensity upslope as a measure of myocardial perfusion was calculated in 32 sectors per heart from pixelwise parametric maps in the subendocardial layer and for full wall thickness. Before coronary angiography, coronary flow reserve (hyperemia induced by dipyridamole 0.56 mg/kg) was determined in corresponding sectors by (13)N-ammonia PET. Receiver-operator characteristic analysis of subendocardial upslope data revealed a sensitivity and specificity of 91% and 94%, respectively, for the detection of coronary artery disease as defined by PET (mean coronary flow reserve minus 2SD of controls) and a sensitivity and specificity of 87% and 85%, respectively, in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography (diameter stenosis >/=50%). The number of pathological sectors per patient on PET and MR studies correlated linearly (slope, 0.94; r=0.76; P<0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: The presented MR approach reliably identifies patients with coronary artery stenoses and provides information on the amount of compromised myocardium, even when perfusion abnormalities are confined to the subendocardial layer. This modality may qualify for its clinical application in the management of coronary artery disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11342469     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.103.18.2230

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  172 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging in detection and functional assessment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Wojciech Mazur; Steffen Brucks; Stephen N Darty; Pairoj Rerkpattanapipat
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.113

2.  Estimation of coronary flow reserve: can SPECT compete with other modalities?

Authors:  G T Gullberg; E V Di Bella; A J Sinusas
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  Contrast agents and cardiac MR imaging of myocardial ischemia: from bench to bedside.

Authors:  Pierre Croisille; Didier Revel; Maythem Saeed
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-04-22       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Steady-state free precession sequences in myocardial first-pass perfusion MR imaging: comparison with TurboFLASH imaging.

Authors:  Peter Hunold; Stefan Maderwald; Holger Eggebrecht; Florian M Vogt; Jörg Barkhausen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-26       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Noninvasive atherosclerosis imaging for predicting cardiovascular events and assessing therapeutic interventions.

Authors:  Douglas S Jacoby; Emile R Mohler III; Daniel J Rader
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 5.113

6.  Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in patients with coronary artery disease: a qualitative approach.

Authors:  Penelope R Sensky; Nilesh J Samani; Christine Reek; Graham R Cherryman
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 7.  Myocardial perfusion imaging by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Katherine C Wu
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 8.  MRI in coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Jörg Barkhausen; Peter Hunold; Kai-Uwe Waltering
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-09-04       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Role of cardiac MRI in diabetes.

Authors:  Ravi V Shah; Siddique A Abbasi; Raymond Y Kwong
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Diagnostic accuracy of stress perfusion CMR in comparison with quantitative coronary angiography: fully quantitative, semiquantitative, and qualitative assessment.

Authors:  Federico E Mordini; Tariq Haddad; Li-Yueh Hsu; Peter Kellman; Tracy B Lowrey; Anthony H Aletras; W Patricia Bandettini; Andrew E Arai
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.