Literature DB >> 16514236

The effect of methodological differences in the measurement of stapes motion in live and cadaver ears.

Wade Chien1, Michael E Ravicz, Saumil N Merchant, John J Rosowski.   

Abstract

Methodological differences in sound-induced stapes velocity (Vs) measurements in live and cadaveric ears were examined using fresh cadaveric temporal bones. On average, differences in preparation (sectioning the stapedius tendon, removing the facial nerve, and widely opening the facial recess) had statistically insignificant effects on measured Vs. Differences in the achievable measurement angle (with respect to the axis of piston-like stapes motion) had a significant effect on measured Vs below 2 kHz. These results suggest that much if not all of the differences in Vs measurements between live and cadaveric ears can be explained by the differences in measurement angle between the two preparations. Measurement angle was found to have minimal effect on measured Vs above 2 kHz. This demonstrates that the commonly used method of estimating stapes translational velocity by dividing the measured velocity by the cosine of the measurement angle is not valid above 2 kHz. Copyright (c) 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16514236      PMCID: PMC2917778          DOI: 10.1159/000091815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiol Neurootol        ISSN: 1420-3030            Impact factor:   1.854


  15 in total

1.  Analysis of the best site on the stapes footplate for ossicular chain reconstruction.

Authors:  M Asai; A M Huber; R L Goode
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.494

2.  Acoustic responses of the human middle ear.

Authors:  S E Voss; J J Rosowski; S N Merchant; W T Peake
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.208

3.  Three-dimensional stapes footplate motion in human temporal bones.

Authors:  Naohito Hato; Stefan Stenfelt; Richard L Goode
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.854

4.  Acoustic input impedance of the stapes and cochlea in human temporal bones.

Authors:  S N Merchant; M E Ravicz; J J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Laser Doppler vibrometer (LDV)--a new clinical tool for the otologist.

Authors:  R L Goode; G Ball; S Nishihara; K Nakamura
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1996-11

6.  Intraoperative assessment of stapes movement.

Authors:  A Huber; T Linder; M Ferrazzini; S Schmid; N Dillier; S Stoeckli; U Fisch
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.547

7.  Mechanisms of hearing loss resulting from middle-ear fluid.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski; Saumil N Merchant
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 3.208

8.  Measurement of the ossicular vibration ratio in human temporal bones by use of a video measuring system.

Authors:  K Gyo; H Aritomo; R L Goode
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1987 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Measurement of umbo vibration in human subjects--method and possible clinical applications.

Authors:  R L Goode; G Ball; S Nishihara
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1993-05

10.  Middle-ear transmission in humans: wide-band, not frequency-tuned?

Authors:  Mario A Ruggero; Andrei N Temchin
Journal:  Acoust Res Lett Online       Date:  2003-03-03
View more
  24 in total

1.  Testing a method for quantifying the output of implantable middle ear hearing devices.

Authors:  J J Rosowski; W Chien; M E Ravicz; S N Merchant
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2007-04-02       Impact factor: 1.854

2.  Transmission matrix analysis of the chinchilla middle ear.

Authors:  Jocelyn E Songer; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Gerbil middle-ear sound transmission from 100 Hz to 60 kHz.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Nigel P Cooper; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Middle-ear velocity transfer function, cochlear input immittance, and middle-ear efficiency in chinchilla.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Simultaneous measurements of ossicular velocity and intracochlear pressure leading to the cochlear input impedance in gerbil.

Authors:  O de la Rochefoucauld; W F Decraemer; S M Khanna; E S Olson
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2008-05-06

6.  Round window membrane implantation with an active middle ear implant: a study of the effects on the performance of round window exposure and transducer tip diameter in human cadaveric temporal bones.

Authors:  Stéphane Tringali; Kanthaiah Koka; Arnaud Deveze; N Julian Holland; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  Sound pressure distribution within natural and artificial human ear canals: forward stimulation.

Authors:  Michael E Ravicz; Jeffrey Tao Cheng; John J Rosowski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Stapes displacement and intracochlear pressure in response to very high level, low frequency sounds.

Authors:  Nathaniel T Greene; Herman A Jenkins; Daniel J Tollin; James R Easter
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 3.208

9.  Motion of the tympanic membrane after cartilage tympanoplasty determined by stroboscopic holography.

Authors:  Antti A Aarnisalo; Jeffrey T Cheng; Michael E Ravicz; Cosme Furlong; Saumil N Merchant; John J Rosowski
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

10.  Mechanisms of tympanic membrane and incus mobility loss in acute otitis media model of guinea pig.

Authors:  Xiying Guan; Rong Z Gan
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-03-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.