Literature DB >> 17665225

The diagnostic value of multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during spine surgery: a prospective study of 1,017 patients.

Martin Sutter1, Andreas Eggspuehler, Dieter Grob, Dezsoe Jeszenszky, Arnaldo Benini, François Porchet, Alfred Mueller, Jiri Dvorak.   

Abstract

A prospective study of 1,017 patients who received MIOM during spine surgery procedures between March 2000 and December 2005. To determine the sensitivity and specificity of MIOM techniques used to monitor spinal cord and nerve roots function during spine surgery. MIOM has become a widely used method of monitoring neural function during spine surgery. Several techniques only monitor either ascending or descending pathways and thus may not provide sensitive or specific results. MIOM aims to monitor both ascending and descending pathways therefore giving immediate feedback information regarding any neurological deficits during the operation. Intraoperative sensory spinal and cortical evoked potentials, combined with monitoring of EMG and motor evoked potentials recorded from the spinal cord and muscles elicited by electrical motor cortex, spinal cord, cauda equina and nerve root stimulation, was evaluated and compared with post-operative clinical neurological changes. One thousand and seventeen consecutive patients underwent a total of 4,731 h of MIOM to evaluate any neural deficits that may have occurred during spine surgery. Of these, 935 were true negative cases, 8 were false negative cases, 66 were true positive cases and 8 were false positive cases, resulting in a sensitivity of 89% and a specificity of 99%. Based on the results of this study, MIOM is an effective method of monitoring the spinal cord functional integrity during spine surgery and therefore can lead to reduction of neurological deficit and consequently improve postoperative results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17665225      PMCID: PMC2072905          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0418-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  13 in total

Review 1.  The application of intraoperative monitoring during surgery for spinal deformity.

Authors:  J H Owen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Evaluation of various evoked potential techniques for spinal cord monitoring during scoliosis surgery.

Authors:  K D Luk; Y Hu; Y W Wong; K M Cheung
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Motor evoked potential monitoring during neurosurgical operations on the spinal cord.

Authors:  J Zentner
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.042

4.  Reversible spinal cord trauma: a model for electrical monitoring of spinal cord function.

Authors:  T J Croft; J S Brodkey; F E Nulsen
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  A method of monitoring function in corticospinal pathways during scoliosis surgery with a note on motor conduction velocities.

Authors:  S G Boyd; J C Rothwell; J M Cowan; P J Webb; T Morley; P Asselman; C D Marsden
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 10.154

6.  Functional monitoring of spinal cord activity during spinal surgery.

Authors:  C Vauzelle; P Stagnara; P Jouvinroux
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Motor-evoked potential monitoring for intramedullary spinal cord tumor surgery: correlation of clinical and neurophysiological data in a series of 100 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  K F Kothbauer; V Deletis; F J Epstein
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  1998-05-15       Impact factor: 4.047

Review 8.  Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in pediatric neurosurgery: why, when, how?

Authors:  Francesco Sala; Matevz J Krzan; Vedran Deletis
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2002-06-13       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Real-time continuous intraoperative electromyographic and somatosensory evoked potential recordings in spinal surgery: correlation of clinical and electrophysiologic findings in a prospective, consecutive series of 213 cases.

Authors:  Thorsteinn Gunnarsson; Andrei V Krassioukov; Roger Sarjeant; Michael G Fehlings
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-03-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Somatosensory evoked potential spinal cord monitoring reduces neurologic deficits after scoliosis surgery: results of a large multicenter survey.

Authors:  M R Nuwer; E G Dawson; L G Carlson; L E Kanim; J E Sherman
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-01
View more
  21 in total

1.  Intraoperative spinal cord and nerve root monitoring: a survey of Canadian spine surgeons.

Authors:  Lissa Peeling; Stephen Hentschel; Richard Fox; Hamilton Hall; Daryl R Fourney
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 2.  Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Nai-Feng Tian; Qi-Shan Huang; Ping Zhou; Yang Zhou; Rui-Kai Wu; Yi Lou; Hua-Zi Xu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Multimodal intraoperative monitoring (MIOM) during cervical spine surgical procedures in 246 patients.

Authors:  Andreas Eggspuehler; Martin A Sutter; Dieter Grob; Dezsö Jeszenszky; François Porchet; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-04       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Current opinions and recommendations on multimodal intraoperative monitoring during spine surgeries.

Authors:  Martin Sutter; Vedran Deletis; Jiri Dvorak; Andreas Eggspuehler; Dieter Grob; David Macdonald; Alfred Mueller; Francesco Sala; Tetsuya Tamaki
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-08-15       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  The impact and value of uni- and multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) on neurological complications during spine surgery: a prospective study of 2728 patients.

Authors:  Martin Sutter; Andreas Eggspuehler; Dezsoe Jeszenszky; Frank Kleinstueck; Tamàs F Fekete; Daniel Haschtmann; François Porchet; Jiri Dvorak
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  A multi-train electrical stimulation protocol facilitates transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials and increases induction rate and reproducibility even in patients with preoperative neurological deficits.

Authors:  Shuta Ushio; Shigenori Kawabata; Satoshi Sumiya; Tsuyoshi Kato; Toshitaka Yoshii; Tsuyoshi Yamada; Mitsuhiro Enomoto; Atsushi Okawa
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.502

7.  Usefulness of multi-channels in intraoperative spinal cord monitoring: multi-center study by the Monitoring Committee of the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research.

Authors:  Zenya Ito; Yukihiro Matsuyama; Kenichi Shinomiya; Muneharu Ando; Shigenori Kawabata; Tsukasa Kanchiku; Takanori Saito; Masato Takahashi; Shinichiro Taniguchi; Naoya Yamamoto; Kei Yamada; Kazunobu Kida; Yasushi Fujiwara; Sho Kobayashi; Kazuhiko Satomi; Toshikazu Tani
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  A CT-based study investigating the relationship between pedicle screw placement and stimulation threshold of compound muscle action potentials measured by intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.

Authors:  Gerit Kulik; Etienne Pralong; John McManus; Damien Debatisse; Constantin Schizas
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-05-19       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Multimodal Intraoperative Spinal Cord Monitoring during Spinal Deformity Surgery: Efficacy, Diagnostic Characteristics, and Algorithm Development.

Authors:  Athanasios I Tsirikos; Andrew D Duckworth; Lindsay E Henderson; Ciara Michaelson
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2019-06-04       Impact factor: 1.927

Review 10.  Improving safety in spinal deformity surgery: advances in navigation and neurologic monitoring.

Authors:  John M Flynn; Denis S Sakai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-22       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.