Literature DB >> 20862593

Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Nai-Feng Tian1, Qi-Shan Huang, Ping Zhou, Yang Zhou, Rui-Kai Wu, Yi Lou, Hua-Zi Xu.   

Abstract

Studies revealed that navigation systems that provided intraoperative assistance might improve pedicle screw insertion accuracy, and also implied that different systems provided different pedicle screw insertion accuracy. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to focus on the pedicle screw insertion accuracy with or without the assistance of image-guided system, and the variance among the different navigation systems. Comparative studies were searched on pedicle screw insertion accuracy between conventional and navigated method, and among different navigation systems. A total of 43 papers, including 28 clinical, 14 cadaveric and 1 model studies, were included in the current study. For clinical articles, there were 3 randomized clinical trials, 4 prospective comparative studies and 21 retrospective comparative studies. The incidence of pedicle violation among computer tomography-based navigation method group was statistically significantly less than that observed among the conventional group (OR 95% CI, in vivo: 0.32-0.60; in vitro: 0.24-0.75 P < 0.01). Two-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation system (OR 95% CI, in vivo: 0.27-0.48; in vitro: 0.43-0.88 P < 0.01) and three-dimension fluoroscopy-based navigation system (OR 95% CI, in vivo: 0.09-0.38; in vitro: 0.09-0.36 P < 0.01) also obtained significant reduced screw deviation rate over traditional methods. Between navigated approaches, statistically insignificant individual and pooled RR values were observed for all in vivo subgroups. Pooled estimate of in vitro studies show that computer tomography-based and three-dimension fluoroscopy-based navigation system provided more accurate pedicle screw insertion over two-dimension fluoroscopy-based navigation system. Our review showed that navigation provided a higher accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws compared with conventional methods. The superiority of navigation systems was obvious when they were applied to abnormal spinal structure. Although no strong in vivo evidence has detected significantly different pedicle screw placement accuracy among the three major navigation systems, meta-analysis revealed the variance in pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different navigation methods.

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20862593      PMCID: PMC3099151          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-010-1577-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  48 in total

1.  Radiation dose for pedicle screw insertion. Fluoroscopic method versus computer-assisted surgery.

Authors:  M Slomczykowski; M Roberto; P Schneeberger; C Ozdoba; P Vock
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-05-15       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Sugano
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 1.601

3.  [Accuracy of CT-based navigation of pedicle screws implantation in the cervical spine compared with X-ray fluoroscopy technique].

Authors:  Ya-jun Liu; Wei Tian; Bo Liu; Qin Li; Lin Hu; Zhi-yu Li; Qiang Yuan; Yong-gang Xing; Yong-qing Wang; Yu-zhen Sun
Journal:  Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2005-10-15

4.  Accuracy of computerized frameless stereotactic image-guided pedicle screw placement into previously fused lumbar spines.

Authors:  Moe R Lim; Federico P Girardi; Sora C Yoon; Russel C Huang; Frank P Cammisa
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Qualitative and quantitative accuracy of CAOS in a standardized in vitro spine model.

Authors:  Markus Arand; Michael Schempf; Thorsten Fleiter; Lothar Kinzl; Florian Gebhard
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Fluoroscopic computer-assisted pedicle screw placement through a mature fusion mass: an assessment of 24 consecutive cases with independent analysis of computed tomography and clinical data.

Authors:  Yoga Raja Rampersaud; Kwang-Soo Lee
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries.

Authors:  S Rajasekaran; S Vidyadhara; Perumal Ramesh; Ajoy P Shetty
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  [Prospective screw misplacement analysis after conventional and navigated pedicle screw implantation].

Authors:  K Seller; A Wild; L Urselmann; R Krauspe
Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 1.411

9.  Does computer-assisted spine surgery reduce intraoperative radiation doses?

Authors:  Florian T Gebhard; Michael D Kraus; Eugen Schneider; Ulrich C Liener; Lothar Kinzl; Markus Arand
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-08-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Cervical pedicle screws: conventional versus computer-assisted placement of cannulated screws.

Authors:  Marcus Richter; Balkan Cakir; René Schmidt
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-10-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  85 in total

1.  Percutaneous posterior transdiscal oblique screw fixation with lateral interbody fusion: a radiological and cadaveric study.

Authors:  Ai-Min Wu; Wen-Fei Ni; Zhen-Xuan Shao; Xiang-Jie Kong; Nai-Feng Tian; Yi-Xing Huang; Zhong-Ke Lin; Hua-Zi Xu; Yong-Long Chi
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Potential use of computer navigation in the treatment of primary benign and malignant tumors in children.

Authors:  Kevan Saidi
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2012-06

3.  Interest of intra-operative 3D imaging in spine surgery: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Sébastien Ruatti; C Dubois; E Chipon; G Kerschbaumer; M Milaire; A Moreau-Gaudry; J Tonetti; Ph Merloz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-07-26       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Computer navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided navigation for thoracic pedicle screw placement: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiao-Tong Meng; Xiao-Fei Guan; Hai-Long Zhang; Shi-Sheng He
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  Pedicle screw insertion accuracy in terms of breach and reposition using a new intraoperative cone beam computed tomography imaging technique and evaluation of the factors associated with these parameters of accuracy: a series of 695 screws.

Authors:  Virginie Cordemans; Ludovic Kaminski; Xavier Banse; Bernard G Francq; Christine Detrembleur; Olivier Cartiaux
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Portable CT scanner-based navigation in lumbar pedicle screw insertion.

Authors:  Pavel Barsa; Petr Suchomel
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Radiation dose reduction in thoracic and lumbar spine instrumentation using navigation based on an intraoperative cone beam CT imaging system: a prospective randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Nathalie Pireau; Virginie Cordemans; Xavier Banse; Nadia Irda; Sébastien Lichtherte; Ludovic Kaminski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Metal artifact reduction using virtual monochromatic images for patients with pedicle screws implants on CT.

Authors:  Yue Dong; Ai Jun Shi; Jian Lin Wu; Ru Xin Wang; Li Fei Sun; Ai Lian Liu; Yi Jun Liu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Computer simulation and image guidance for individualised dynamic spinal stabilization.

Authors:  S R Kantelhardt; U Hausen; M Kosterhon; A N Amr; K Gruber; A Giese
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-01-04       Impact factor: 2.924

10.  Inserting pedicle screws in lumbar spondylolisthesis - The easy bone conserving way.

Authors:  Hitesh Lal; Lalit Kumar; Ramesh Kumar; Tankeshwar Boruah; Pankaj Kumar Jindal; Vinod Kumar Sabharwal
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-03-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.